linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: scu: Move register defines to header file
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:35:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1a315fae482bbc82fc15cb7df2561de@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110125125656.GG13300@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux at arm.linux.org.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:27 PM
> To: Santosh Shilimkar
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; catalin.marinas at arm.com;
> ccross at android.com; linus.ml.walleij at gmail.com; linux-
> omap at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: scu: Move register defines to header
> file
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:06:27PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > Ok. I missed some information my last email.
> > The SCU power status programming is used to take CPU in/out
> > of coherency as an alternative to SMP bit. We don't
> > have an access to SMP bit on OMAP4. ARM has already
> > confirmed SCU programming is same as SMP bit enable/disable.
> >
> > I don't know how safe is to use spin lock when one CPU is
> > goes out of coherency after programming the power state. The
> > spin lock release may not even be visible to other CPU.
>
> Erm, I do hope that's not the case, as that means it is unsafe for
> CPUs in
> a SMP system to write to this register without them potentially
> trampling
> over each other.
>
> If it is the case, then the solutions are either:
> 1. Fix the hardware so that coherency requests only yet turned off
>    when entering the WFI state.
> 2. Fix the hardware such that each CPU has a separate register.
>
> I can't see a software solution to this as we can't use ldrex/strex
> anything
> but memory regions, and memory regions without coherency won't work.
> Maybe ARM Support can help by suggesting how a 4-CPU system is
> supposed
> to safely read/modify/write the SCU power control register...

On system wide suspend scenario's this is already handled because
CPU's are taken down always sequentially.

In CPU ILDE because of some other hardware restrictions we have it
sequenced in 2 CPU system. CPU1 needs to be in OFF mode before any
power management can be done on system along with master core.
And that's how it is working without any races on OMAP

Regards,
Santosh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-25 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-24  8:51 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: Few patches for PM enablement Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-24  8:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: gic: Add hooks for architecture specific extensions Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25  3:03   ` Colin Cross
2011-01-25 20:54     ` Colin Cross
2011-01-26  7:22       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-26  7:23         ` Colin Cross
2011-01-26  7:31           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-26  7:52             ` Colin Cross
2011-01-26  7:55               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-24  8:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: gic: Add distributor and interface enable/disable accessory api Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-01  5:58   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-24  8:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: twd: Add context save restore support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-24 11:06   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 11:11     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 11:16       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25  7:39       ` Colin Cross
2011-01-25 10:32         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 13:23           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-25 13:37             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 13:55               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 14:12               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-25 14:15                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 14:24                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-25 16:04               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 16:13                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 16:14                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 11:29         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 11:40           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 11:48             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 12:08               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 12:17                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 12:20                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 18:44           ` Colin Cross
2011-01-24 11:14     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-24  8:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: scu: Move register defines to header file Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 11:46   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 12:02     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 12:16       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 12:29         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 12:39           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 12:36         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 12:56           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 13:04             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 13:06               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 18:23                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-04 10:41                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-04 10:46                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-04 11:30                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-04 11:34                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-07  9:51                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-07 10:18                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-07 10:21                             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-07 10:23                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-07 10:30                                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-10 14:49                             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-10 16:13                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 16:26                                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-25 13:05             ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-01-25 13:41           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 13:47             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-24  8:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: smp: Skip secondary cpu calibration to speed-up boot Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-24 10:30   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24  8:51 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-01-24  8:55   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-04 10:19 ` [PATCH 0/5] ARM: Few patches for PM enablement Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-11 14:24   ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f1a315fae482bbc82fc15cb7df2561de@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).