From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35B2C761AF for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:05:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=9B64ofqnzvPrPsJ2Z42OlVh0pL2RoAQYX/l2Ma+dDpo=; b=CbLtPMVoDy0jLX fNMxQ4dBdNnU+MplpR2rw/zGDfyhMpptw9/BXLJPVTMWFhsS2zn7IFzv3yamYMdQllGzYJ12X4//c 2KCZq7TFiFZ0y2LBasN8ctPYPpzwc3dxbOTyDozennDlFbAVh8a6q3jUdWl09y7lyTkpffZP3HKOM 5fhk8UNR61fbYxpNF0hrQlfwBdSZ2CMolbnJ6ME7Cs3H0TiDpzox5Isrz6LhYgQTzMtFQUuXRJj6Z 1VtpZj6IonHbb1sbSq65Lou9z7swEoMuG7c0wo/FeESi+RoGREGiCvEeX19dMSZddUquIN9UdHIQN 3uyJ2ifx+me/dJQp7uqA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1piEQz-007TIs-27; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:04:49 +0000 Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.221]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1piEQw-007TI8-2q; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:04:48 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5C8582670; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:04:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:04:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1680267885; x=1680275085; bh=Yf 6BPXqc5+4lmQ5wl2xtIuAGvUiY5BeudyAFy0EZ0G8=; b=uZNEHaxzYCVqJlOAFe QyTGIrtKOzaG3cycJ6z13gjgQTZlhniIOf1HqwjYjO+LKgEQjawzudKts8yI8F6C s8uj/7ZqVN8UGH5ZgZFIXMyd5b75HqrmeNrZ8vsEJBVSpi2J3ZWlL4UkN8mHXtQA GGAWo9PRgMqmoTCuDthWrNh+w6KhXBpQbLLxMJMKAnJljfVDgqgBdZYQ1YQkl+H6 LZF9xoMeCYQEcBMHzHxAdJ1E4ywnG504K4JuUFuXrw0flCzwupmtajEoLwVwD19b WT1JJ6Nt4Zmjo8gqjmpMMSo4dacmgE9f6vIbQ+V6NrcMdQ2gozhdVyKm6v87HBEM ZV+g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1680267885; x=1680275085; bh=Yf6BPXqc5+4lm Q5wl2xtIuAGvUiY5BeudyAFy0EZ0G8=; b=KUzHmHuPZ/ods4YSgTzEfYrM3rPW4 wY1sW3YIixU8cPi3ERC0CqbsRY1SanLUJ0aZrBgOR4qWoyaz63HiFfoH3UAybnQT l28FyLxSxhC8yvKK0U29T5xndO1MnAOFIprhP3Ccq4nl8DZqPNjxy1R1RtNY8tPM 10Qj7i/N0QTRDJZBhjBFHWgb2R8ePLqUj5cPixNs1c/I5cS8MzaXIOWn+kPofhss o5aXvgsWtBzOhKzG5Xt8hpy17hyFm2BD/GRH9jCAvBdUli4r8v/AMdn17Lkc1Dnf 2N0OT3xREpdvfAtCeC38I5tHCQLbXD8KwEF4WisGqz7N4lPVjlEATH8EA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdeiuddgheeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftehr nhguuceuvghrghhmrghnnhdfuceorghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepffehueegteeihfegtefhjefgtdeugfegjeelheejueethfefgeeghfektdek teffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprg hrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6B754B6008D; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:04:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-238-g746678b8b6-fm-20230329.001-g746678b8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20230327222514.GA17904@lst.de> References: <20230327121317.4081816-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20230327121317.4081816-22-arnd@kernel.org> <20230327222514.GA17904@lst.de> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 15:04:23 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Christoph Hellwig" , "Arnd Bergmann" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Vineet Gupta" , "Russell King" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Linus Walleij" , "Catalin Marinas" , "Will Deacon" , guoren , "Brian Cain" , "Geert Uytterhoeven" , "Michal Simek" , "Thomas Bogendoerfer" , "Dinh Nguyen" , "Stafford Horne" , "Helge Deller" , "Michael Ellerman" , "Christophe Leroy" , "Paul Walmsley" , "Palmer Dabbelt" , "Rich Felker" , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" , "David S . Miller" , "Max Filippov" , "Robin Murphy" , "Lad, Prabhakar" , "Conor.Dooley" , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-oxnas@groups.io" , "linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org" , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] dma-mapping: replace custom code with generic implementation X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230331_060446_992117_8E1AB109 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.75 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Mar 28, 2023, at 00:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> +static inline void arch_dma_cache_wback(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size) >> { >> + dma_cache_wback(paddr, size); >> +} >> >> +static inline void arch_dma_cache_inv(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size) >> +{ >> + dma_cache_inv(paddr, size); >> } > >> +static inline void arch_dma_cache_wback_inv(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size) >> { >> + dma_cache_wback_inv(paddr, size); >> +} > > There are the only calls for the three functions for each of the > involved functions. So I'd rather rename the low-level symbols > (and drop the pointless exports for two of them) rather than adding > these wrapppers. > > The same is probably true for many other architectures. Ok, done that now. >> +static inline bool arch_sync_dma_clean_before_fromdevice(void) >> +{ >> + return false; >> +} >> >> +static inline bool arch_sync_dma_cpu_needs_post_dma_flush(void) >> +{ >> + return true; >> } > > Is there a way to cut down on this boilerplate code by just having > sane default, and Kconfig options to override them if they are not > runtime decisions? I've changed arch_sync_dma_clean_before_fromdevice() to a Kconfig symbol now, as this is never a runtime decision. For arch_sync_dma_cpu_needs_post_dma_flush(), I have this version now in common code, which lets mips and arm have their own logic and has the same effect elsewhere: +#ifndef arch_sync_dma_cpu_needs_post_dma_flush +static inline bool arch_sync_dma_cpu_needs_post_dma_flush(void) +{ + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU); +} +#endif >> +#include > > I can't really say I like the #include version here despite your > rationale in the commit log. I can probably live with it if you > think it is absolutely worth it, but I'm really not in favor of it. > >> +config ARCH_DMA_MARK_DCACHE_CLEAN >> + def_bool y > > What do we need this symbol for? Unless I'm missing something it is > always enable for arm32, and only used in arm32 code. This was left over from an earlier draft and accidentally duplicates the thing that I have in the Arm version for the existing ARCH_HAS_DMA_MARK_CLEAN. I dropped this one and the generic copy of the arch_dma_mark_dcache_clean() function now, but still need to revisit the arm version, as it sounds like it has slightly different semantics from the ia64 version. Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel