From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBF56C433F5 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:27:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=mzIDbqHFkqgKiXT72ldtDUSom6HVZyDuS2PMPfuuYdQ=; b=3YsOn2kP7KV6Hyx2C6KEFhLGtp VxJ+hN9z09hy93EpgcLctP/hkFDa+IHqvLd4NMTF9XADAGD7Bhb9SgRnmYJJcpBH26/HI4ZMnjE/6 JSs96UKgVHg5k0se34I2qvAE9y+R/Efbb/pU8SkERap+vhT3N3EC7li+wbIIEHu0PPKK6gJvGM1DA dzcswx+cn5yTwijk1GFKeTRQlprVJ6wYsurv88PYBV6mT1Kpz9EMxDobft+nhMxetLj1WokO++BN9 Zh9+gUpVodUqeE3ezAdejduQRQNB7wIFX9m3Ap996HjEaJS12XTJbxImpfvs7yP+i46W/Z7ZTpZSW 7IEI5rjw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nJpPk-000C8H-75; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:26:08 +0000 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nJpPc-000C6j-Js for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:26:06 +0000 Received: from dggpeml500025.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4JySfn0hT3zccxL; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:24:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.117] (10.174.176.117) by dggpeml500025.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:25:53 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] bpf, arm64: support more atomic ops To: Alexei Starovoitov , Mark Rutland CC: Martin KaFai Lau , Yonghong Song , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Song Liu , "David S . Miller" , John Fastabend , , , Zi Shen Lim , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Julien Thierry , Ard Biesheuvel , References: <20220129220452.194585-1-houtao1@huawei.com> From: Hou Tao Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:25:53 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220129220452.194585-1-houtao1@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.117] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggpeml500025.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.35) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220214_202601_024991_4C821702 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.38 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org ping ? On 1/30/2022 6:04 AM, Hou Tao wrote: > Hi, > > Atomics support in bpf has already been done by "Atomics for eBPF" > patch series [1], but it only adds support for x86, and this patchset > adds support for arm64. > > Patch #1 & patch #2 are arm64 related. Patch #1 moves the common used > macro AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT into insn-def.h for insn.h. Patch #2 adds > necessary encoder helpers for atomic operations. > > Patch #3 implements atomic[64]_fetch_add, atomic[64]_[fetch_]{and,or,xor} > and atomic[64]_{xchg|cmpxchg} for arm64 bpf. Patch #4 changes the type of > test program from fentry/ to raw_tp/ for atomics test. > > For cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HAS_LSE_ATOMICS) case and no-LSE-ATOMICS case, > ./test_verifier, "./test_progs -t atomic", and "insmod ./test_bpf.ko" > are exercised and passed correspondingly. > > Comments are always welcome. > > Regards, > Tao > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-2-jackmanb@google.com/ > > Change Log: > v3: > * split arm64 insn related code into a separated patch (from Mark) > * update enum name in aarch64_insn_mem_atomic_op (from Mark) > * consider all cases for aarch64_insn_mem_order_type and > aarch64_insn_mb_type (from Mark) > * exercise and pass "insmod ./test_bpf.ko" test (suggested by Daniel) > * remove aarch64_insn_gen_store_release_ex() and extend > aarch64_insn_ldst_type instead > * compile aarch64_insn_gen_atomic_ld_op(), aarch64_insn_gen_cas() and > emit_lse_atomic() out when CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS is disabled. > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220127075322.675323-1-houtao1@huawei.com/ > * patch #1: use two separated ASSERT_OK() instead of ASSERT_TRUE() > * add Acked-by tag for both patches > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220121135632.136976-1-houtao1@huawei.com/ > > Hou Tao (4): > arm64: move AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT into insn-def.h > arm64: insn: add encoders for atomic operations > bpf, arm64: support more atomic operations > selftests/bpf: use raw_tp program for atomic test > > arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 12 - > arch/arm64/include/asm/insn-def.h | 14 ++ > arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 80 ++++++- > arch/arm64/lib/insn.c | 185 +++++++++++++-- > arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h | 44 +++- > arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 223 ++++++++++++++---- > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomics.c | 91 ++----- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/atomics.c | 28 +-- > 8 files changed, 517 insertions(+), 160 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel