From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54ED9C46CD2 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:28:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=HWXEEI9PFRRjC55FAwlTnZmNkvfeCfWQ06b9ztiYI6M=; b=VjHfzPmJrz7qFh M2bhho2dU3iQbaDzl2hDgpFwHVy3RAYLcXUkRZMsaQdwNc08VfAjbVzKtpIZLN6FGaggICSEZeGPZ wnZ8XII377RIKN/XvZ14u+zA4qV7uSn+hCwOe1VG++tr5ijujN5lmexd/qUbMyRbjS81JAf3Sd17u m5c+tW0aQQGk1o1fcc4za/dXfm1aHNB6S1ewhVlz8RT7Pek+E8cY7EOYodMC5bNHtN/OUOa5uBvDO B8XRMa0dChvvfMG26bxOIjIQdrbLOGiBCDOZULNxAi7mV38kRKVTm2VvNmSiZDE1Nv8JxwZ6onBbd gr+05W/LGRX4WUMwLezA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rSh3D-004TQs-0W; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:28:35 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rSh3A-004TPl-1w for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:28:34 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1706117291; x=1706722091; i=wahrenst@gmx.net; bh=H+PqRdahESOhwBQHRpCPYTPjtB4Ee5lSleiuK+QP+sc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To; b=Q/lh0GNJqpz67/AyCGWWRuiAIuFIPfPdn+8PzCtcer4OZEyLB2fzclad4rrUq/bK I7qbZo62uYZ483RBU1ck6IOsleMdBvBkuOshiX73Ge0b8XZuAo0Z/ujvh/LfIbEKJ 6OQCOhEM/DfvyQEOZfr16+rVsI/dUWi7M4TYH1bzpfkrtPtD1/Ot1ECF5ywt+/tHV +WRvJEhD4Zfa3+nI9obdNK97XJxdnHeXjcf1P2eBrHuqQmqfIZ+SbbZBz6rTU46RK KFzMmkIFwQ2LHuum/Dk/4aNX+YkZeK639n4GzE2E0BR3DQ2KMUG/KlgElWwFYdMI0 MSQ4p8SYN6hdAUeXKw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from [192.168.1.167] ([37.4.248.43]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MgesG-1qsXsl1Qse-00h4rE; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:28:11 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:28:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: imx93: Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93 support To: Mathieu Othacehe , Wadim Egorov Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Li Yang , Primoz Fiser , Christoph Stoidner , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, upstream@lists.phytec.de References: <20240122095306.14084-1-othacehe@gnu.org> <20240122095306.14084-4-othacehe@gnu.org> <537266fe-0bf7-4208-a9f3-ae27f462c6ed@phytec.de> <85fe8c8b-ea08-4f24-9a06-33a5678c1a0a@gmx.net> <7944bd80-32d7-4ac3-9c0a-806394262f1c@phytec.de> <08ef805a-b041-4db0-aaf7-51d5d06596ff@gmx.net> <008317aa-4dd1-4889-8c64-5e4396d83931@phytec.de> <47c79a0a-5be0-4ee8-87d4-fd03809a9664@gmx.net> <87o7da4zc1.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Stefan Wahren In-Reply-To: <87o7da4zc1.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:eRZ7xQ3BPGslVgUOuVkixGadYqVW+b3sXGg9awfX0Jozyuk5lRh LW46X/BC6XQAdYVlzxlVbbhp3VLHxUs9tSTyhxPAWoEf3AItqOaDbDCnFa7MMo5JVQYIEFq HHkwTSfXElCDtNUOuLgYHk9Gddbfh6YTnkJ2JQG9V/+Qf5EVLMsX/7GymSasxQ2Cy10X6pu eBEn7BESEDrNPFrNDVOyA== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:Xx/BKrwc9cg=;AoM4FjyIddteEhdRtHq2gsEvkVU 7RnglQm+WKRb/xUL946Hv/kumRulIqSS1Z5Qm8MKBQsJqhGbBG/JHKyS+MbHbfdF+skHKdjEx 6Yf8Frj+j9uZ0fydJ61/0b9E0sEtsiex5GUYYH31FPVJ8nD5uMBtvhSJAWJ4q6OB914z4N7KH LOC3mcjoSQCd441KYH19CNi5cwnMeY3whh9AM62fvwP+Tdw7pGGmsYDICeZdwjcTH1R4PHaiz qedA9oBC3LWLGSlQ6ffcUsRvBR2HRZNG3aSCEB5Nzw7imc1fdJB7yftZPb5G0bFZfc3EFZH/o S6wBDCjwfZ2tp7pP2pHvEQrP+pIEIfLXyBNEldFPKRU68FhiiooiECaxxeK1KcZRZuKpa6mDw vz9jdQ1s+L/Xi0TK41rswdNKBq22xKgfZDLM21gX+kwR+JwQcHo2jJ3C3Hzd6P3n/5sbsaARi FY8+fzr3vXb6fH6yUSYLqczX8RhYx1gsifK7EMk+qRawscEstWGCjJj3QVWO4ehnX6qGiQTQs Cv3N1r20s9COUlw4l4u0TvBksp0Sdk5z/0j2Z0zmnKLjdVDiPY55VF6N8X3/vV3LqBzcaLgjJ lXi5BUogpDOtwN5PeTnimuD9x1jh2ognE23jxOfGpr8qENGJ+OL7o3swCSpiQCiJeUoyREqtc AYXqihAgZMOMxI64WGKKSWow1NpoIDB+I90wc6S///MIAiHpyA3ptZM/+0HeRMAu8brfAFjN+ ltAuLoUZE7xCwzpKhFAQnrjE1si5k0yEqWjp/ymH3ddWdMGYU/ohH2MgXwec2SijpBX3Xv+HB ztG0i9aSLdfCHqpCq3/7JdyfI79VaJHrWBcgxQvbIEsIpRCzpYuU719m4SuK4T3cvxEROymzC wS+rmHbIPkvVfPZ07VNUfQ7M3P4cP+i4j2mCB5JOlYYDy+LvGUKRWrDyyX5DA6kA189OCXESE MN2a2YFhf1jakJvtCTiCUEGyVw8= X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240124_092832_951756_178E29E1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.27 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hello Mathieu, Am 24.01.24 um 14:48 schrieb Mathieu Othacehe: > Hello Stefan, > >>> Defining line names should be fine. But I would still prefer to have >>> the muxing in an overlay bound to a specific use case. >> I'm fine with this. Unfortunately Mathieu dropped the line names in V5 >> today :-( >> >> AFAIR reviewers should have 2 weeks time maximum. This was just 2 days. > I am sorry but it is not easy for me to deal with contradictory input. I > chose to remove the gpio-line-names even though it also seemed like a > nice addition to me. The idea was to not interfere with Phytec plans in > the future. tbh sending v5 before the discussion between Wadim and me was finished made it more complicated. Please keep in mind that some reviewers do this in their spare time, so a response could take some time. In this particular case Wadim and me agreed on a solution, so no action from your side was necessary except a little bit patience. The reason why i suggested the gpio-line-names in the first place is that users doesn't need to care about different versions of the DT files (except the downstream one). Changing the line names afterwards leads to confusion. So before we discuss on a v6, just a question: are on the X16 connector just 2 pins muxable as GPIO? This is hard to believe. Best regards > There is no hurry and I can always restore them in a v6. > > Let me know what you think, > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel