From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70206C4321A for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44F6920673 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="AUz0xBy8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 44F6920673 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=fqP1oe0V/GQs+K/TDqm/dwUQHDhr3yYEZHV0JFZiYFc=; b=AUz0xBy8w2V/Y1GqUy4ct1CuU YMotG2hmza4cRDEK+25d9qDhFOlBDN1rS4QUSd2rqTyrtw61b0KlruIUGtdKZ7d7Cc1ayu8vG7Y6s uP3AclmfewPDx5dJ35pq5p27rp2Kyiioa89Q0UiaHArzvnNux5yfwDjX77tgPc9ZglsuB6y7MYX5W 2OxQIVLtCXhxGJFGYzO7hN6u3bu4yQY04LOTgCAiySD2KhEgoT9VvmiFtycdaVGdyY/S3pRMXIQiK KDYhVT0WwGOnIb1CeeIsSuitKOvW3i+uIrTe3+kO9a5fwuQuicgOGYG44pk/bIMNR7VusD4XNb8Di IiYIA8DYw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hajOf-0008CS-E7; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:13:17 +0000 Received: from mail-qt1-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hajOc-0008Bx-2w for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:13:15 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-f173.google.com with SMTP id x2so14324249qtr.0 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:13:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NJDk1Q37w05I2y3JaQodc4xcmS+MNK+AHHU+/E49axw=; b=oR9Zi3hTKxeQ0tU7haiSW3AKAAT232xGADqrlAT/D7cBaUHQUOdwo8LGRW0ZyL0/73 gRerg58eUXgT21QCB6W9zeZDHorLfMzfxtd3m6yL+1/dR8DRPGQtGN/nTP04PwVGyCsW FLMoydgRpvISxmPw2GHjFdZ0sKnw9W0gtCzPsOtBt9gFusEOjNwYOFZcmgFvWlkq1jWI E8zY3azKbMgWinKwnwC2F9O/INHJxp0c1ltqdmsKpkRrGqY119jh+mav4T55/6cutl2R LSKker4MVmYXDb0uUrh6R5xyfON6Y56PQGd6iLqe9FQ1rbD7MnslkkvNG1pleBQC8Xlv mrhg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV7RKOkASXfaTTvl5bVgVnN0gStQ7R+LorvH69Jz+e9spSQuP9B Rkuxw4Rcheb51WTnjkDGlBEwnw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxwVu1iRlu2c8pgibaj34iVBzF1HhpHiafjgVCgPdH8zA5QXtDcEQlppMJ2mi6AHqxbha2OQQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7a87:: with SMTP id x7mr55591921qtr.215.1560269592251; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:13:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:543:8101:1d87::729? ([2601:543:8101:1d87::729]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v41sm8299001qta.78.2019.06.11.09.13.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:13:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING breaks atomic64 test on arm64 To: Will Deacon References: <20190529112956.GE4485@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> <20190611155025.GI4324@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> From: Laura Abbott Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 12:13:10 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190611155025.GI4324@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190611_091314_131650_BF8A6B57 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.94 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-arm-kernel , Andrew.Murray@arm.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 6/11/19 11:50 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Laura, > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: >> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:42:04PM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote: >>> CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is a selectable option on arm64 now. It currently >>> triggers a bug on the CONFIG_ATOMIC64_SELFTEST: >> >> At this point, I'd be inclined to raise something in the GCC bugzilla >> with the result of --save-temps for the failing atomic64_test.c. Maybe >> they will have a better opinion as to whether we're doing something wrong >> here. Is that something you're willing to do, or shall I do it? > > Did you file a GCC bugzilla entry for this, or shall I go ahead and make > a new one (assuming I can remember my credentials for that thing)? > > Will > I didn't file one, if you already have the account I'm happy to let you do that since I don't actually have one (maybe I should though at the rate I seem to stumble across bugs...) Thanks, Laura _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel