From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: memory: additional compatible strings for Broadcom DPFE
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:27:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f46951b9-36b0-4155-b6ac-3d3f7cc8ef37@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240119215231.758844-4-mmayer@broadcom.com>
On 19/01/2024 22:52, Markus Mayer wrote:
> Add versioned compatible strings for Broadcom DPFE. These take the form
> brcm,dpfe-cpu-v<N> where <N> is a number from 1 to 4.
>
> The chip-specific strings have been kept for compatibility purposes
> (hardware is in the field). For new chips, the properly versioned
> compatible string should be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
> ---
> .../memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml | 21 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml
> index 3f00bc2fd3ec..42c8160d95d1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml
> @@ -10,9 +10,28 @@ maintainers:
> - Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> - Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
>
> +description: |
> +
Drop blank line.
> + The DCPU (DDR PHY Front End CPU) interfaces directly with the DDR PHY
> + chip on Broadcom STB SoCs. An API exists for other agents to retrieve
> + or set certain DDR PHY chip parameters by JEDEC.
> +
> + Different, incompatible versions of this API have been created over
> + time. The API has changed for the some chips as development progressed
> + and features were added or changed.
> +
> + We rely on the boot firmware (which already knows the API version
> + required) to populate Device Tree with the corresponding compatible
> + string.
> +
> properties:
> compatible:
> items:
> + - enum:
> + - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v1
> + - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v2
> + - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v3
> + - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v4
I don't see my comment resolved - except more unusual order of
compatibles - and nothing in commit msg explains my previous concerns.
I think my final comment was pretty clear yet ignored completely. There
was no follow up:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/3fff866f-fbe8-4d23-87f3-275380adf3d4@linaro.org/
so with ignored comments: NAK
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 21:52 [PATCH v2 0/5] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: support DPFE API v4 Markus Mayer
2024-01-19 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: memory: remove generic compatible string brcm,dpfe-cpu Markus Mayer
2024-01-23 21:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-02-01 22:01 ` Markus Mayer
2024-01-19 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: memory: add two chip-specific compatible string Markus Mayer
2024-01-23 21:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-02-01 22:03 ` Markus Mayer
2024-01-19 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: memory: additional compatible strings for Broadcom DPFE Markus Mayer
2024-01-23 21:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2024-02-01 22:36 ` Markus Mayer
2024-02-02 7:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-19 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: introduce version-specific compatible strings Markus Mayer
2024-01-23 21:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-02-01 22:40 ` Markus Mayer
2024-02-02 7:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-19 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: support DPFE API v4 Markus Mayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f46951b9-36b0-4155-b6ac-3d3f7cc8ef37@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mmayer@broadcom.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).