Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Fix build error

From: Ren Zhijie <renzhijie2@huawei.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..."
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Fix build error
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:00:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f565a5b5-8ba2-adbb-8093-6d60b2159222@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0LCaMoWArcQNY5qayUABgRXWEogrtQQ-sbR+zY6n=O4w@mail.gmail.com>

在 2022/7/25 14:34, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:38 AM Ren Zhijie <renzhijie2@huawei.com> wrote:
>> 在 2022/7/13 16:48, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
>>
>> I try to use the new marcos SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS and RUNTIME_PM_OPS to
>> replace the old ones, and remove #ifdef around the declarations in the
>> header, my local changes attach below.
>>
>> But it seems  that doesn't work, which has ld errors:
>>
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
>> aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
>> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.o: In function `ufs_mtk_runtime_resume':
>> ufs-mediatek.c:(.text+0x1d0c): undefined reference to
>> `ufshcd_runtime_resume'
>> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.o: In function `ufs_mtk_runtime_suspend':
>> ufs-mediatek.c:(.text+0x1d64): undefined reference to
>> `ufshcd_runtime_suspend'
>> Makefile:1255: recipe for target 'vmlinux' failed
>> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>>
>> (CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are both not set, and
>>
> It appears that there is a mistake in the RUNTIME_PM_OPS()
> macro definition, can you try this patch on top?

Hi Arnd,

I apply this patch and it worked.

When will this patch be merged?

Thanks,

Ren

>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> index 871c9c49ec9d..84592229d754 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> @@ -334,9 +334,9 @@ struct dev_pm_ops {
>          .restore_noirq = pm_sleep_ptr(resume_fn),
>
>   #define RUNTIME_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn, idle_fn) \
> -       .runtime_suspend = suspend_fn, \
> -       .runtime_resume = resume_fn, \
> -       .runtime_idle = idle_fn,
> +       .runtime_suspend = pm_ptr(suspend_fn), \
> +       .runtime_resume = pm_ptr(resume_fn), \
> +       .runtime_idle = pm_ptr(idle_fn),
>
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>   #define SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn) \
>
> Commit 1a3c7bb08826 ("PM: core: Add new *_PM_OPS macros, deprecate
> old ones") introduced all the macros with the intent of using pm_ptr()
> and pm_sleep_ptr() in them, and I think Paul accidentally forgot to add
> those in this instance.
>
>         Arnd
>
> .

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel