linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	dev.jain@arm.com, cl@gentwo.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: mm: relax VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP if BBML2_NOABORT is supported
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:08:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6e31f0d-a256-4d58-adfb-4d3d97dbaef2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251013232803.3065100-3-yang@os.amperecomputing.com>

On 14/10/2025 00:27, Yang Shi wrote:
> When changing permissions for vmalloc area, VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP area is
> exclueded because kernel can't split the va mapping if it is called on
> partial range.
> It is no longer true if the machines support BBML2_NOABORT after commit
> a166563e7ec3 ("arm64: mm: support large block mapping when rodata=full").
> So we can relax this restriction and update the comments accordingly.

Is there actually any user that benefits from this modified behaviour in the
current kernel? If not, then I'd prefer to leave this for Dev to modify
systematically as part of his series to enable VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP by default for
arm64. I believe he's planning to post that soon.

Thanks,
Ryan

> 
> Fixes: a166563e7ec3 ("arm64: mm: support large block mapping when rodata=full")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> index c21a2c319028..b4dcae6273a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -157,13 +157,13 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Kernel VA mappings are always live, and splitting live section
> -	 * mappings into page mappings may cause TLB conflicts. This means
> -	 * we have to ensure that changing the permission bits of the range
> -	 * we are operating on does not result in such splitting.
> +	 * mappings into page mappings may cause TLB conflicts on the machines
> +	 * which don't support BBML2_NOABORT.
>  	 *
>  	 * Let's restrict ourselves to mappings created by vmalloc (or vmap).
> -	 * Disallow VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP mappings to guarantee that only page
> -	 * mappings are updated and splitting is never needed.
> +	 * Disallow VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP mappings if the systems don't support
> +	 * BBML2_NOABORT to guarantee that only page mappings are updated and
> +	 * splitting is never needed on those machines.
>  	 *
>  	 * So check whether the [addr, addr + size) interval is entirely
>  	 * covered by precisely one VM area that has the VM_ALLOC flag set.
> @@ -171,7 +171,8 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>  	area = find_vm_area((void *)addr);
>  	if (!area ||
>  	    end > (unsigned long)kasan_reset_tag(area->addr) + area->size ||
> -	    ((area->flags & (VM_ALLOC | VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP)) != VM_ALLOC))
> +	    !(area->flags & VM_ALLOC) || ((area->flags & VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP) &&
> +	    !system_supports_bbml2_noabort()))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!numpages)



  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-14  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-13 23:27 [PATCH 0/2] Two minor fixes for BBML2_NOABORT Yang Shi
2025-10-13 23:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: make linear mapping permission update more robust for patial range Yang Shi
2025-10-14  8:05   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-14 20:15     ` Yang Shi
2025-10-15  6:46   ` Dev Jain
2025-10-16 18:45     ` Yang Shi
2025-10-16 18:47       ` Dev Jain
2025-10-13 23:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: mm: relax VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP if BBML2_NOABORT is supported Yang Shi
2025-10-14  8:08   ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-10-14 20:23     ` Yang Shi
2025-10-15  6:50   ` Dev Jain
2025-10-16 18:50     ` Yang Shi
2025-10-17 15:50       ` Dev Jain
2025-10-30 13:16         ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6e31f0d-a256-4d58-adfb-4d3d97dbaef2@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).