From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfraprado@collabora.com,
rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com, zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Use readx_poll_timeout() instead of custom function
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 11:25:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8acbc75-970c-62fb-ad0d-914e512104a7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220516124659.69484-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
On 16/05/2022 14:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Function pwrap_wait_for_state() is a function that polls an address
> through a helper function, but this is the very same operation that
> the readx_poll_timeout macro means to do.
> Convert all instances of calling pwrap_wait_for_state() to instead
> use the read_poll_timeout macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
> Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 60 +++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> index bf39a64f3ecc..54a5300ab72b 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
>
> +#define PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US 10
> +#define PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 10000
> +
> #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_IORD_ARB_EN 0x4
> #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_WACS3_EN 0x10
> #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_INIT_DONE3 0x14
> @@ -1241,27 +1244,14 @@ static bool pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> (val & PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0);
> }
>
> -static int pwrap_wait_for_state(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp,
> - bool (*fp)(struct pmic_wrapper *))
> -{
> - unsigned long timeout;
> -
> - timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(10000);
> -
> - do {
> - if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> - return fp(wrp) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
> - if (fp(wrp))
> - return 0;
> - } while (1);
> -}
> -
> static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata)
> {
> + bool tmp;
> int ret;
> u32 val;
>
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp,
hm, if we make the cond (tmp > 0) that would help to understand the code. At
least I had to think about it for a moment. But I leave it to you if you think
it's worth the effort.
Regards,
Matthias
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> if (ret) {
> pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp);
> return ret;
> @@ -1273,7 +1263,8 @@ static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata)
> val = (adr >> 1) << 16;
> pwrap_writel(wrp, val, PWRAP_WACS2_CMD);
>
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr, wrp, tmp, tmp,
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1290,11 +1281,14 @@ static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata)
>
> static int pwrap_read32(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata)
> {
> + bool tmp;
> int ret, msb;
>
> *rdata = 0;
> for (msb = 0; msb < 2; msb++) {
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp,
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> +
> if (ret) {
> pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp);
> return ret;
> @@ -1303,7 +1297,8 @@ static int pwrap_read32(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata)
> pwrap_writel(wrp, ((msb << 30) | (adr << 16)),
> PWRAP_WACS2_CMD);
>
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr, wrp, tmp, tmp,
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1323,9 +1318,11 @@ static int pwrap_read(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata)
>
> static int pwrap_write16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
> {
> + bool tmp;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp,
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> if (ret) {
> pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp);
> return ret;
> @@ -1344,10 +1341,12 @@ static int pwrap_write16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
>
> static int pwrap_write32(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
> {
> + bool tmp;
> int ret, msb, rdata;
>
> for (msb = 0; msb < 2; msb++) {
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp,
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> if (ret) {
> pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp);
> return ret;
> @@ -1388,6 +1387,7 @@ static int pwrap_regmap_write(void *context, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
>
> static int pwrap_reset_spislave(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> {
> + bool tmp;
> int ret, i;
>
> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0, PWRAP_HIPRIO_ARB_EN);
> @@ -1407,7 +1407,8 @@ static int pwrap_reset_spislave(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> pwrap_writel(wrp, wrp->master->spi_w | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTS,
> PWRAP_MAN_CMD);
>
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_sync_idle);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_sync_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp,
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(wrp->dev, "%s fail, ret=%d\n", __func__, ret);
> return ret;
> @@ -1458,14 +1459,15 @@ static int pwrap_init_sidly(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> static int pwrap_init_dual_io(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> {
> int ret;
> + bool tmp;
> u32 rdata;
>
> /* Enable dual IO mode */
> pwrap_write(wrp, wrp->slave->dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_DIO_EN], 1);
>
> /* Check IDLE & INIT_DONE in advance */
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp,
> - pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp,
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(wrp->dev, "%s fail, ret=%d\n", __func__, ret);
> return ret;
> @@ -1570,6 +1572,7 @@ static bool pwrap_is_pmic_cipher_ready(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> {
> int ret;
> + bool tmp;
> u32 rdata = 0;
>
> pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_CIPHER_SWRST);
> @@ -1624,14 +1627,16 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> }
>
> /* wait for cipher data ready@AP */
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_cipher_ready);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_cipher_ready, wrp, tmp, tmp,
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(wrp->dev, "cipher data ready@AP fail, ret=%d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> /* wait for cipher data ready@PMIC */
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_pmic_cipher_ready);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_pmic_cipher_ready, wrp, tmp, tmp,
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(wrp->dev,
> "timeout waiting for cipher data ready@PMIC\n");
> @@ -1640,7 +1645,8 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
>
> /* wait for cipher mode idle */
> pwrap_write(wrp, wrp->slave->dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_MODE], 0x1);
> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle);
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp,
> + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(wrp->dev, "cipher mode idle fail, ret=%d\n", ret);
> return ret;
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-17 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-16 12:46 [PATCH v3 0/5] MediaTek PMIC Wrap improvements and cleanups AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-16 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Use readx_poll_timeout() instead of custom function AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-17 9:25 ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2022-05-17 9:41 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-17 9:44 ` Matthias Brugger
2022-05-16 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Switch to devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-16 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Move and check return value of platform_get_irq() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-17 9:18 ` Matthias Brugger
2022-05-17 9:34 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-17 9:49 ` Matthias Brugger
2022-05-17 10:35 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-16 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Move IO pointers to new structure AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-16 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Compress of_device_id entries to one line AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-05-17 9:23 ` Matthias Brugger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8acbc75-970c-62fb-ad0d-914e512104a7@gmail.com \
--to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nfraprado@collabora.com \
--cc=rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).