Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] arm64/mm: Clear PXX_TYPE_MASK and set PXD_TYPE_SECT in [pmd|pud]_mkhuge()
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:28:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8cf7bf8-4162-4846-bdcb-4793e4aeb439@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9RsxL98s23mvqJa@arm.com>

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 05:52:04PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 01:54:01PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Hello Anshuman Khandual,
> > 
> > Commit 1601df9e366e ("arm64/mm: Clear PXX_TYPE_MASK and set
> > PXD_TYPE_SECT in [pmd|pud]_mkhuge()") from Feb 21, 2025 (linux-next),
> > leads to the following (unpublished) Smatch static checker warning:
> > 
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:587 pmd_mkhuge() warn: odd binop '0x1 & 0xfffffffffffffffe'
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:626 pud_mkhuge() warn: odd binop '0x1 & 0xfffffffffffffffe'
> > 
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> >     579 static inline pmd_t pmd_mkhuge(pmd_t pmd)
> >     580 {
> >     581         /*
> >     582          * It's possible that the pmd is present-invalid on entry
> >     583          * and in that case it needs to remain present-invalid on
> >     584          * exit. So ensure the VALID bit does not get modified.
> >     585          */
> >     586         pmdval_t mask = PMD_TYPE_MASK & ~PTE_VALID;
> > --> 587         pmdval_t val = PMD_TYPE_SECT & ~PTE_VALID;
> > 
> > This is "1 & ~1".  I see the comment, but I'm too stupid to know even
> > after reading he comment whether it's intentional or not.  :P
> > 
> >     588 
> >     589         return __pmd((pmd_val(pmd) & ~mask) | val);
> >     590 }
> 
> Prior to the above commit, the code was:
> 
> #define pmd_mkhuge(pmd)			(__pmd(pmd_val(pmd) & ~PMD_TABLE_BIT))
> 
> So just clearing a bit. That's why the reworked code has val 0 in the
> current configuration. This may change with support for 128-bit PTEs
> though, different format.
> 
> The comment is about preserving the PTE_VALID bit in the original pmd
> value, so it's masked out of both mask and val.
> 
> It's good that smatch catches these though. Any way to mark a false
> positive?

In the kernel, all old warnings are false positives.  We're good at
fixing things.  People can look it up on lore and find this thread
if they have questions.

regards,
dan carpenter



      reply	other threads:[~2025-03-15  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-14 10:54 [bug report] arm64/mm: Clear PXX_TYPE_MASK and set PXD_TYPE_SECT in [pmd|pud]_mkhuge() Dan Carpenter
2025-03-14 17:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-15  8:28   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8cf7bf8-4162-4846-bdcb-4793e4aeb439@stanley.mountain \
    --to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox