From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F93CD4F39 for ; Thu, 14 May 2026 12:54:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From :Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=IGmmA25MzQ0QSmWjpBXK6pXRXVRs8Lwh0MLR3QNsuKA=; b=gF0XMlMTy/sNljJw65ZkfR0CGS yz9uxV4NTRoEQ6MtRU/B2y2RLUOIVDbHeO0TKvFejw3MhdvuEwK0EDVnFAU4KOaAEQjv5p7rsjDZb LyligWRtjAS+sMYdFvc1AGimxxvpkObpNRJKHO0qCKgHACVu6VS3FjQriG1PX7p+O7ifEQAJyGYWl PDoEt8k56t5ItmEJZdNhQpVy3zG+/KOMpnl9eBXYYBI0k3qaetW2yYwO8QmLGU9+th8dUipwtw7CE DLwsVsJxQK8Ib4bFR+hmEThfznmkBiDeCAOdfUbhXZ3tlVLUIxeL+5wXUcUXLupSw3FJC4kS4PJfu QBL8w/Mw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wNVaK-00000005WW0-3Upl; Thu, 14 May 2026 12:54:40 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wNVaK-00000005WVl-0jA5 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 14 May 2026 12:54:40 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949716012B; Thu, 14 May 2026 12:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D47C5C2BCB3; Thu, 14 May 2026 12:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 22:54:32 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] m68k: mcf5441x: setup DAC clock name as per driver name To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Steven King , Arnd Bergmann , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , =?UTF-8?Q?Nuno_S=C3=A1?= , Andy Shevchenko , Greg Ungerer , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org References: <20260513-wip-stmark2-dac-v2-0-fcdae50cf51a@baylibre.com> <20260513-wip-stmark2-dac-v2-3-fcdae50cf51a@baylibre.com> <734e2323-78dc-43c7-b5fc-0a35cc72e035@linux-m68k.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Greg Ungerer In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Angelo, On 14/5/26 17:05, Angelo Dureghello wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On 14.05.2026 11:27, Greg Ungerer wrote: >> Hi Angelo, >> >> On 13/5/26 19:14, Angelo Dureghello wrote: >>> From: Angelo Dureghello >>> >>> Later in this patchset, the mcf54415 DAC driver is added. >>> Considering some other different ColdFire cpu DACs exists, the DAC driver >>> is named as "mcf54415_dac", related to the mcf5441x family SoCs with >>> DACs (mcf54415/6/7/8). >>> >>> So updating DAC clock names to bind with proper driver name. >> >> I am not sure I like naming the clocks here with a prefix for the >> specific SoC part number this is in. It might be unlikely now, but >> what if another ColdFire family SoC member uses this same hardware block? >> That is very common amongst other hardware blocks within the ColdFire >> family. Can we come up with a name more specific to just this type >> of DAC hardware block? >> > > from a brief study, this 12bit DAC, and DAC module in general, is only on > this mcf45441x family. There are some ColdFire with ADC only, as those > mcf5249/53/82. > The mcf51mm/ag/je are the opnly to have a 5bit dacs, but these are mcus. > So, if i don't miss any existing model, the name may be correct, > unless we want rename it to a more generic mcf_dac. Yes, I would suggest just leaving it as is, "mcfdac". That is not currently used by any other ColdFire variants supported by the kernel. Regards Greg >> Regards >> Greg >> >> > > Regards, > angelo >> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello >>> --- >>> arch/m68k/coldfire/m5441x.c | 8 ++++---- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/m68k/coldfire/m5441x.c b/arch/m68k/coldfire/m5441x.c >>> index 5b5e09ecf487..b724d7fc1a08 100644 >>> --- a/arch/m68k/coldfire/m5441x.c >>> +++ b/arch/m68k/coldfire/m5441x.c >>> @@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcfpit.2", 34, MCF_BUSCLK); >>> DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcfpit.3", 35, MCF_BUSCLK); >>> DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcfeport.0", 36, MCF_CLK); >>> DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcfadc.0", 37, MCF_CLK); >>> -DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcfdac.0", 38, MCF_CLK); >>> -DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcfdac.1", 39, MCF_CLK); >>> +DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcf54415_dac.0", 38, MCF_CLK); >>> +DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcf54415_dac.1", 39, MCF_CLK); >>> DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcfrtc.0", 42, MCF_CLK); >>> DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcfsim.0", 43, MCF_CLK); >>> DEFINE_CLK(0, "mcfusb-otg.0", 44, MCF_CLK); >>> @@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ static struct clk_lookup m5411x_clk_lookup[] = { >>> CLKDEV_INIT("mcfpit.3", NULL, &__clk_0_35), >>> CLKDEV_INIT("mcfeport.0", NULL, &__clk_0_36), >>> CLKDEV_INIT("mcfadc.0", NULL, &__clk_0_37), >>> - CLKDEV_INIT("mcfdac.0", NULL, &__clk_0_38), >>> - CLKDEV_INIT("mcfdac.1", NULL, &__clk_0_39), >>> + CLKDEV_INIT("mcf54415_dac.0", NULL, &__clk_0_38), >>> + CLKDEV_INIT("mcf54415_dac.1", NULL, &__clk_0_39), >>> CLKDEV_INIT("mcfrtc.0", NULL, &__clk_0_42), >>> CLKDEV_INIT("mcfsim.0", NULL, &__clk_0_43), >>> CLKDEV_INIT("mcfusb-otg.0", NULL, &__clk_0_44), >>> >>