linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arm64/spinlock: fix a -Wunused-function warning
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:36:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f95c27b1-a8ca-bac8-e6bb-07ca9e87bcd9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48DF011A-3074-422C-BFBA-1A9F2EF4A7BA@lca.pw>

On 1/23/20 12:31 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>> On Jan 23, 2020, at 11:56 AM, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Damn, the whole point of this was to warn in the case that
>> vcpu_is_preempted() does get defined for arm64. Can we force it to evaluate
>> the macro argument instead (e.g. ({ (cpu), false; }) or something)?
> Actually, static inline should be better.
>
> #define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
> static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> {
> 	return false;
> }
>
Yes, that may work.

Cheers,
Longman


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-23 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-23 16:29 [PATCH -next] arm64/spinlock: fix a -Wunused-function warning Qian Cai
2020-01-23 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2020-01-23 17:23   ` Qian Cai
2020-01-23 17:31   ` Qian Cai
2020-01-23 17:36     ` Waiman Long [this message]
2020-01-23 17:11 ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f95c27b1-a8ca-bac8-e6bb-07ca9e87bcd9@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).