linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prasanna Kumar T S M <ptsm@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	ionela.voinescu@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: sumitg@nvidia.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com, lihuisong@huawei.com,
	zhanjie9@hisilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] cpufreq: Allow arch_freq_get_on_cpu to return an error
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 16:17:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9606b7c-e20c-43cb-bc03-1deecb0d7539@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250121084435.2839280-2-beata.michalska@arm.com>


On 21-01-2025 14:14, Beata Michalska wrote:
> Allow arch_freq_get_on_cpu to return an error for cases when retrieving
> current CPU frequency is not possible, whether that being due to lack of
> required arch support or due to other circumstances when the current
> frequency cannot be determined at given point of time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c | 2 +-
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c       | 7 +++++--
>   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c        | 8 ++++----
>   include/linux/cpufreq.h          | 2 +-
>   4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
> index f642de2ebdac..6cf31a1649c4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ void arch_scale_freq_tick(void)
>    */
>   #define MAX_SAMPLE_AGE	((unsigned long)HZ / 50)
>   
> -unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
> +int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
>   {
>   	struct aperfmperf *s = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_samples, cpu);
>   	unsigned int seq, freq;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> index 41ed01f46bd9..d79f5845a463 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> @@ -86,9 +86,12 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>   		seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode);
>   
>   	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
> -		unsigned int freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(cpu);
> +		int freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(cpu);
>   
> -		seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n", freq / 1000, (freq % 1000));
> +		if (freq <= 0)
> +			seq_puts(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: Unknown\n");
> +		else
> +			seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n", freq / 1000, (freq % 1000));
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Cache size */
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 418236fef172..6f45684483c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -728,18 +728,18 @@ show_one(cpuinfo_transition_latency, cpuinfo.transition_latency);
>   show_one(scaling_min_freq, min);
>   show_one(scaling_max_freq, max);
>   
> -__weak unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
> +__weak int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
>   {
> -	return 0;
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>   }
>   
>   static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>   {
>   	ssize_t ret;
> -	unsigned int freq;
> +	int freq;
>   
>   	freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu);
> -	if (freq)
> +	if (freq > 0)
>   		ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", freq);
>   	else if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get)
>   		ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu));
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 7fe0981a7e46..02fd4746231d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ static inline int of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int pcpu, const char *list_
>   }
>   #endif
>   
> -extern unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu);
> +extern int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu);
>   
>   #ifndef arch_set_freq_scale
>   static __always_inline

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Prasanna Kumar T S M <ptsm@linux.microsoft.com>




  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-21 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-21  8:44 [PATCH v9 0/5] Add support for AArch64 AMUv1-based average freq Beata Michalska
2025-01-21  8:44 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] cpufreq: Allow arch_freq_get_on_cpu to return an error Beata Michalska
2025-01-21 10:47   ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-21 15:14     ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-21 18:40       ` Vanshidhar Konda
2025-01-23 21:37         ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-22  6:12       ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-23 21:45         ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-24  3:33           ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-28  8:09             ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-28  8:18               ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-21 10:47   ` Prasanna Kumar T S M [this message]
2025-01-24  4:15   ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-21  8:44 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] cpufreq: Introduce an optional cpuinfo_avg_freq sysfs entry Beata Michalska
2025-01-21 10:53   ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-21 15:17     ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-22  6:09       ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-23 21:47         ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-24  3:27           ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-28  8:43   ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-29 11:29   ` Sumit Gupta
2025-01-21  8:44 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] arm64: amu: Delay allocating cpumask for AMU FIE support Beata Michalska
2025-01-24  4:48   ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-29 11:17   ` Sumit Gupta
2025-01-21  8:44 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] arm64: Provide an AMU-based version of arch_freq_get_on_cpu Beata Michalska
2025-01-24  4:43   ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-28  8:16     ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-28  8:52       ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-29 11:15   ` Sumit Gupta
2025-01-21  8:44 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] arm64: Update AMU-based freq scale factor on entering idle Beata Michalska
2025-01-24  4:45   ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-29 11:13   ` Sumit Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f9606b7c-e20c-43cb-bc03-1deecb0d7539@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=ptsm@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).