From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBE0C433E0 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 22:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9627205CB for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 22:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="qGggJWwG"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b="sReUeHvw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E9627205CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Content-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Message-ID:Date:To:From:Subject:Reply-To:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Y2ibIjjRMfRGbdQqeNA8ebqVfVm/TI3yfn3kIAaQi2I=; b=qGggJWwGu0dPNY eRFEEenDGioQFU1pHeC8Xk8/KN+cISgV/Rc6KcBIYmTyIEniWFeIXuXT+CdjyxEWtIm8pdpIZKW0L 56E4x/+4EXgXcM9eox3R0yxkdvaJCPv3kSf1IjTCxoGacJvOyG9VqyK2c/f9SqgouL4bHrabEXTTo QiJWD/k5YgTTBAeP/ZwocfevDjdBdUQKNkCdQwQ6HjVRW67dvJTGyJFI4KnOT0zHgTqePy94msVLa uG+WyTAfW+6RCGuixgL1xdCZS+Ew1zEJIbbQjyZNxID/7l3+BB3LJok5EH9HoPvlIaoQfmgMwkZpU 5a9cUPu5lBFULFPP36YQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jgbfE-0000Bo-Dm; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 22:15:12 +0000 Received: from smtp-fw-6001.amazon.com ([52.95.48.154]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jgbfA-0007ll-TO for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 22:15:10 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1591222509; x=1622758509; h=from:to:cc:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=5CLSuOEl6kp/m5zDZRq2EDb6vpTaiAn/I7znqlFCqRY=; b=sReUeHvwaCq0m5/SEX06N9Vrq7yxbFHKEaKTi2Qa91kywkGGfTaDBznA iCiN8qBXkA1VOxyIQ1pC7ZEkzQQbOnpU+9e+lLs70kRUFY9D4HLEgRv/y jNw2wBAIXw0E5fqdX8sDdg1/5xEePvqtA/i9D+B7uL5I1Mgf9VHeV7h24 s=; IronPort-SDR: 7hvDfCXNo8Vr7FgXXyGQZNr75iNAVfSbjODKi+Nx9uHtlKKxhu1o9kNG4QhtvP3RxxpPGjN+i0 TO8KiY5N0iCA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,470,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="35664223" Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Don't try to move a disabled irq Thread-Topic: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Don't try to move a disabled irq Received: from iad12-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan3.amazon.com (HELO email-inbound-relay-2b-baacba05.us-west-2.amazon.com) ([10.43.8.6]) by smtp-border-fw-out-6001.iad6.amazon.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2020 22:14:52 +0000 Received: from EX13MTAUWB001.ant.amazon.com (pdx4-ws-svc-p6-lb7-vlan2.pdx.amazon.com [10.170.41.162]) by email-inbound-relay-2b-baacba05.us-west-2.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16D47A17E3; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 22:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EX13D02UWB003.ant.amazon.com (10.43.161.48) by EX13MTAUWB001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.161.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 22:14:50 +0000 Received: from EX13D21UWB003.ant.amazon.com (10.43.161.212) by EX13D02UWB003.ant.amazon.com (10.43.161.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 22:14:50 +0000 Received: from EX13D21UWB003.ant.amazon.com ([10.43.161.212]) by EX13D21UWB003.ant.amazon.com ([10.43.161.212]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 22:14:50 +0000 From: "Herrenschmidt, Benjamin" To: "maz@kernel.org" , "Saidi, Ali" Thread-Index: AQHWOQ5TND6+7PCCIEqxmbZ5Z514UqjHAeMAgAB0yQA= Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 22:14:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <622fb6be108e894ee365d6b213535c8b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <622fb6be108e894ee365d6b213535c8b@kernel.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.43.160.100] Content-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200603_151509_082873_EB857C92 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.23 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "jason@lakedaemon.net" , "Machulsky, Zorik" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Zilberman, Zeev" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "Woodhouse, David" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 16:16 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > My original patch should certain check activated and not disabled. > > With that do you still have reservations Marc? > > I'd still prefer it if we could do something in core code, rather > than spreading these checks in the individual drivers. If we can't, > fair enough. But it feels like the core set_affinity function could > just do the same thing in a single place (although the started vs > activated is yet another piece of the puzzle I didn't consider, > and the ITS doesn't need the "can_reserve" thing). For the sake of fixing the problem in a timely and backportable way I would suggest first merging the fix, *then* fixing the core core. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel