* ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc8 (arm-next)
@ 2020-10-06 1:15 CKI Project
2020-10-06 8:22 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: CKI Project @ 2020-10-06 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: will, catalin.marinas, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Memory Management, Rachel Sibley, Jan Stancek
Hello,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
Commit: e37569e28eea - Merge branch 'for-next/late-arrivals' into for-kernelci
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
Merge: OK
Compile: OK
Tests: FAILED
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse/2020/10/05/614774
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64:
❌ LTP
We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'
______________________________________________________________________________
Compile testing
---------------
We compiled the kernel for 1 architecture:
aarch64:
make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
aarch64:
Host 1:
✅ Boot test
✅ xfstests - ext4
✅ xfstests - xfs
✅ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
✅ storage: software RAID testing
✅ stress: stress-ng
🚧 ✅ xfstests - btrfs
🚧 ❌ IPMI driver test
🚧 ✅ IPMItool loop stress test
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
🚧 ✅ Storage nvme - tcp
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
✅ ACPI table test
✅ ACPI enabled test
✅ Podman system integration test - as root
✅ Podman system integration test - as user
❌ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory: fork_mem
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
✅ Networking bridge: sanity
✅ Networking socket: fuzz
✅ Networking: igmp conformance test
✅ Networking route: pmtu
✅ Networking route_func - local
✅ Networking route_func - forward
✅ Networking TCP: keepalive test
✅ Networking UDP: socket
✅ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
✅ Networking tunnel: gre basic
✅ L2TP basic test
✅ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic
✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns - transport
✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns - tunnel
✅ Libkcapi AF_ALG test
✅ pciutils: update pci ids test
✅ ALSA PCM loopback test
✅ ALSA Control (mixer) Userspace Element test
✅ storage: SCSI VPD
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
🚧 ✅ Firmware test suite
🚧 ✅ jvm - jcstress tests
🚧 ✅ Memory function: kaslr
🚧 ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
🚧 ✅ Networking firewall: basic netfilter test
🚧 ✅ audit: audit testsuite test
🚧 ✅ trace: ftrace/tracer
🚧 ✅ kdump - kexec_boot
Test sources: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests
💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!
Aborted tests
-------------
Tests that didn't complete running successfully are marked with ⚡⚡⚡.
If this was caused by an infrastructure issue, we try to mark that
explicitly in the report.
Waived tests
------------
If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are
executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are
being fixed.
Testing timeout
---------------
We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
finished running yet are marked with ⏱.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc8 (arm-next)
2020-10-06 1:15 ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc8 (arm-next) CKI Project
@ 2020-10-06 8:22 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <ce1d05d0-50b3-ac86-f1d6-c82f59317582@redhat.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2020-10-06 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: CKI Project
Cc: catalin.marinas, Memory Management, Rachel Sibley, Jan Stancek,
linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 01:15:18AM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
>
> Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> Commit: e37569e28eea - Merge branch 'for-next/late-arrivals' into for-kernelci
>
> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
>
> Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> Merge: OK
> Compile: OK
> Tests: FAILED
>
> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
>
> https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse/2020/10/05/614774
Hmm, this link doesn't seem to work (the '10' directory doesn't exist). Do I
just need to wait a bit longer?
Cheers,
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc8 (arm-next)
[not found] ` <ce1d05d0-50b3-ac86-f1d6-c82f59317582@redhat.com>
@ 2020-10-06 12:45 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <2c19157a-a31f-dfe5-de05-94d73cc1be67@redhat.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2020-10-06 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Iñaki Malerba, viresh.kumar
Cc: Rachel Sibley, catalin.marinas, Memory Management, CKI Project,
Jan Stancek, linux-arm-kernel
[+Viresh as he wrote this test]
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 12:54:59PM +0200, Iñaki Malerba wrote:
> El 6/10/20 a las 10:22, Will Deacon escribió:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 01:15:18AM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
> >> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> >>
> >> Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> >> Commit: e37569e28eea - Merge branch 'for-next/late-arrivals' into for-kernelci
> >>
> >> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> >>
> >> Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> >> Merge: OK
> >> Compile: OK
> >> Tests: FAILED
> >>
> >> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> >>
> >> https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse/2020/10/05/614774
> >
> > Hmm, this link doesn't seem to work (the '10' directory doesn't exist). Do I
> > just need to wait a bit longer?
>
> Thanks for reporting this!
>
> There was a problem on the script that uploads the files. It's fixed now
> and the files are deploying. In a few minutes everything should be there.
>
> Your report also made us realize the link is incorrect, as the prefix
> should be `datawarehouse-public` instead of `datawarehouse` (with the
> correct prefix it should link to the correct folder).
>
> The (now working) link is the following:
>
> https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/10/05/614774
>
> Sorry for the troubles,
Thanks, that works now. It looks like the failure is in the timed semaphore
tests:
semop03.c:55: TFAIL: unexpected failure: EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK (11)
where the text expects EINTR, but assumedly the timeout is kicking in
so we get EAGAIN. I don't see how the arm64 tree can be causing that, and I
rather suspect that the test is just racy (the timeout is pretty small --
10ms iiuc).
It also looks like this test was only added to LTP in September, so that
would explain why it appears to be a new failure.
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc8 (arm-next)
[not found] ` <2c19157a-a31f-dfe5-de05-94d73cc1be67@redhat.com>
@ 2020-10-07 5:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-07 17:11 ` Rachel Sibley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2020-10-07 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rachel Sibley
Cc: chrubis, catalin.marinas, Memory Management, CKI Project,
Iñaki Malerba, Will Deacon, Jan Stancek, linux-arm-kernel
On 06-10-20, 10:09, Rachel Sibley wrote:
>
>
> On 10/6/20 8:45 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > [+Viresh as he wrote this test]
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 12:54:59PM +0200, Iñaki Malerba wrote:
> > > El 6/10/20 a las 10:22, Will Deacon escribió:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 01:15:18AM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
> > > > > We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> > > > >
> > > > > Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> > > > > Commit: e37569e28eea - Merge branch 'for-next/late-arrivals' into for-kernelci
> > > > >
> > > > > The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> > > > >
> > > > > Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> > > > > Merge: OK
> > > > > Compile: OK
> > > > > Tests: FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse/2020/10/05/614774
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, this link doesn't seem to work (the '10' directory doesn't exist). Do I
> > > > just need to wait a bit longer?
> > >
> > > Thanks for reporting this!
> > >
> > > There was a problem on the script that uploads the files. It's fixed now
> > > and the files are deploying. In a few minutes everything should be there.
> > >
> > > Your report also made us realize the link is incorrect, as the prefix
> > > should be `datawarehouse-public` instead of `datawarehouse` (with the
> > > correct prefix it should link to the correct folder).
> > >
> > > The (now working) link is the following:
> > >
> > > https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/10/05/614774
> > >
> > > Sorry for the troubles,
> >
> > Thanks, that works now. It looks like the failure is in the timed semaphore
> > tests:
> >
> > semop03.c:55: TFAIL: unexpected failure: EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK (11)
> >
> > where the text expects EINTR, but assumedly the timeout is kicking in
> > so we get EAGAIN. I don't see how the arm64 tree can be causing that, and I
> > rather suspect that the test is just racy (the timeout is pretty small --
> > 10ms iiuc).
That is one possible explanation for sure.
Rachel, can you please increase the timeout to something sufficiently
big enough and try again ? Something like this:
- tst_ts_set_sec(&timeout, 0);
+ tst_ts_set_sec(&timeout, 2);
I saw similar issues with very small timeouts and 10ms kind of worked
all the time. I think we need to increase it further.
--
viresh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc8 (arm-next)
2020-10-07 5:33 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2020-10-07 17:11 ` Rachel Sibley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rachel Sibley @ 2020-10-07 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: chrubis, catalin.marinas, Memory Management, CKI Project,
Iñaki Malerba, Will Deacon, Jan Stancek, linux-arm-kernel
On 10/7/20 1:33 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 06-10-20, 10:09, Rachel Sibley wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/6/20 8:45 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> [+Viresh as he wrote this test]
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 12:54:59PM +0200, Iñaki Malerba wrote:
>>>> El 6/10/20 a las 10:22, Will Deacon escribió:
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 01:15:18AM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
>>>>>> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>>>>>> Commit: e37569e28eea - Merge branch 'for-next/late-arrivals' into for-kernelci
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>>>>>> Merge: OK
>>>>>> Compile: OK
>>>>>> Tests: FAILED
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse/2020/10/05/614774
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm, this link doesn't seem to work (the '10' directory doesn't exist). Do I
>>>>> just need to wait a bit longer?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for reporting this!
>>>>
>>>> There was a problem on the script that uploads the files. It's fixed now
>>>> and the files are deploying. In a few minutes everything should be there.
>>>>
>>>> Your report also made us realize the link is incorrect, as the prefix
>>>> should be `datawarehouse-public` instead of `datawarehouse` (with the
>>>> correct prefix it should link to the correct folder).
>>>>
>>>> The (now working) link is the following:
>>>>
>>>> https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/10/05/614774
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the troubles,
>>>
>>> Thanks, that works now. It looks like the failure is in the timed semaphore
>>> tests:
>>>
>>> semop03.c:55: TFAIL: unexpected failure: EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK (11)
>>>
>>> where the text expects EINTR, but assumedly the timeout is kicking in
>>> so we get EAGAIN. I don't see how the arm64 tree can be causing that, and I
>>> rather suspect that the test is just racy (the timeout is pretty small --
>>> 10ms iiuc).
>
> That is one possible explanation for sure.
>
> Rachel, can you please increase the timeout to something sufficiently
> big enough and try again ? Something like this:
>
> - tst_ts_set_sec(&timeout, 0);
> + tst_ts_set_sec(&timeout, 2);
>
> I saw similar issues with very small timeouts and 10ms kind of worked
> all the time. I think we need to increase it further.
Thanks for your patch Viresh, just ran it on the same machine/kernel for 100 loops, and happy to confirm I no longer
see the failures, increasing the timeout worked well.
Thanks!
Rachel
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-07 17:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-06 1:15 ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc8 (arm-next) CKI Project
2020-10-06 8:22 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <ce1d05d0-50b3-ac86-f1d6-c82f59317582@redhat.com>
2020-10-06 12:45 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <2c19157a-a31f-dfe5-de05-94d73cc1be67@redhat.com>
2020-10-07 5:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-07 17:11 ` Rachel Sibley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).