From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:23:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCHv2 08/11] fec: fix uninitialized rx buffer usage In-Reply-To: References: <240f12ca87d7666f31263aabc620a9ec197cd8ff.1265173480.git.amit.kucheria@canonical.com> <752ae69adb57d4f73fa011ba380cea1b927b9c8b.1265173480.git.amit.kucheria@canonical.com> <37786d4b1002031033s15d0b24et82c3f0e45112ae65@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Amit Kucheria > wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Grant Likely wrote: >>> >>> fec related patches 8 & 9 look okay to me. >>> >>> g. >> >> Can I take that as an Acked-by? > > of course. BTW, since these 2 patches are essentially independent, you may find it easier to get all the patches merged if you post the FEC changes in a separate patch series. g.