From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A121CC43334 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 06:46:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=in/XgWkvx8fS9dmNiqHXmVg2RHDG9CWIr/Oc6Rnj7Bw=; b=sQ/2t2/knjxaAj Xen6DOZiC0i0CX3doYABk8JQwvzYhuD+VoOPYbJFxg+Jp4xc+Bt1B8B2ZZmczXA/MmtuI19MJBC6J G/x2yToIQUAD5wRFYUD1y8qIB0OAuaP6hM3Dm5leyiRR0Nie5HVG9q70hI3MF1N53LUJ3JjIT064B ceaY2xQxtYX6p0KaR3fJ2rbcF7Kkq7wKcKB0nU5v8zlzi2WROtGRFqLF8ag5Wkj25psCbnF2yKBHv fTwZMVnpt29FcTJhCPBo8aGjAnfeTCKz+E1kunCzJW96QjtVjiyC1n0dZLKqVLZJs9vRnyQZFoQ4h DxjZsl2yFv30a2vs67Ag==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nwea6-001opZ-Oy; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 06:45:19 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nweZM-001oCA-Vf for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 06:44:34 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1654152272; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VoyA/L0tlcMVaTBmlf7Z/ZHtCkE4mBDsIVQpvWHfbKo=; b=Gja57O4bWOz//WkR0cChSpwpMcMQK9Cnjru8kKR7aeZCfox15ooe13bTeScGSeQLbiPyvt 0iTys12CtS3o75gE/55h16pd6TsI4H4I0ferO8NTebGdJIhNwB/jBA+6eLTw27/S349DTk A2mgd29Bh/zEMKXnRz6jTLJUZj/cs4Q= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-235-Gb2az9dsP8-kaBxZr050Yw-1; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 02:44:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Gb2az9dsP8-kaBxZr050Yw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76CE11C006B1; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 06:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.72.12.91] (ovpn-12-91.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.91]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8DC87AD8; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 06:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/16] arch_topology: Drop LLC identifier stash from the CPU topology To: Sudeep Holla Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Atish Patra , Atish Patra , Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen , Dietmar Eggemann , Qing Wang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring References: <20220525081416.3306043-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-5-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-6-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-7-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-8-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-9-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-10-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <3860bfcc-a323-c031-0fdd-77001d338bec@redhat.com> <20220601120658.2x737nhyxmodoo7t@bogus> From: Gavin Shan Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 14:44:04 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220601120658.2x737nhyxmodoo7t@bogus> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220601_234433_135882_A1103584 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.38 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Gavin Shan Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Sudeep, On 6/1/22 8:06 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 11:35:20AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote: >> On 5/25/22 4:14 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>> Since the cacheinfo LLC information is used directly in arch_topology, >>> there is no need to parse and store the LLC ID information only for >>> ACPI systems in the CPU topology. >>> >>> Remove the redundant LLC ID from the generic CPU arch_topology information. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla >>> --- >>> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 1 - >>> include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 - >>> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) >>> >> >> How about merge the changes to PATCH[08/16]? I don't see why we need put >> the changes into separate patches. >> > > It took a while to remember as I was with the same opinion as yours but > decided to split them for one reason: to keep arch specific change in a > separate patch(if that becomes a need due to some conflict or some other > non-technical reason) > Ok. Thanks for the explanation, which sounds reasonable to me. Thanks, Gavin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel