public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: xieyisheng1@huawei.com (Yisheng Xie)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] arm64/mm: handle memmap kernel option
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:24:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb1cdb09-3b75-cec8-dce2-7cabc99108da@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170227084808.GA31271@remoulade>

hi Mark,

Thanks for comment
On 2017/2/27 16:48, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:48:50AM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> On 2017/2/26 18:46, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 25 February 2017 at 06:47, Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>>>> To make user reserve memory for some specific use more convenient,
>>>> this patch implement the following memmap variants:
>>>>  - memmap=nn[KMG]$ss[KMG]: mark specified memory as reserved;
>>>>  - memmap=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]: force usage of a specific region of memory;
> 
>>> Could you explain which problem you are solving here? ACPI implies
>>> UEFI on arm64, and so these reservations could be made by a boot
>>> component instead, if it requires a fixed memory reservation. If this
>>> is a reservation for, e.g., OP-TEE, we should not rely on the command
>>> line to communicate this information.
>>>
>> We just want to reserve some memory for a driver and I just not so familiar
>> with how to reserve memory with UEFI. So doubt about whether it is suitable
>> to reserve memory with cmdline like "memmap=xxx", which had appeared in x86
>> for a long time.
> 
> Could you please explain for what purpose this is necessary?
> 
> Does the driver need a specific region of memory? Or just some contiguous
> region? Or something else?
> 
Yes, we want to use a specific region of memory.

> For the former, this is not an appropriate solution; firmware must absolutely
> mark the memory as reserved for a particular purpose.
> 
I see, so just forget about this patch. sorry for disturbing.

Thanks again for your explain.
Yisheng Xie

> If you just need contiguous physical memory, I believe it would be better to
> use CMA, and request CMA reserve a larger area if necessary.
> 



> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
> .
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-27 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-25  6:47 [PATCH RFC] arm64/mm: handle memmap kernel option Yisheng Xie
2017-02-26 10:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-27  3:48   ` Yisheng Xie
2017-02-27  8:48     ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-27 10:24       ` Yisheng Xie [this message]
2017-02-27 11:42         ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb1cdb09-3b75-cec8-dce2-7cabc99108da@huawei.com \
    --to=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox