Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

Andrew Morton
2025-03-28T22:55:03Z

On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:14:55 -0600 Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On 3/13/25 16:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:31:12 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It makes a bunch of my
> >>>> very noisy tests much easier to deal with.
> >>>
> >>> And for the record, we're also affected by this in DRM and would very
> >>> much like to get it merged in one shape or another.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I was unable to get maintainers of major architectures interested enough
> >> to provide feedback, and did not see a path forward. Maybe Alessandro
> >> has more success than me.
> >
> > I'll put them into mm.git, to advance things a bit.
>
> I haven't heard from kunit maintainers yet. This thread got lost
> in inbox due to travel.
>
> David/Brendan/Rae, Okay to take this series?
>
>
> Andrew, Okay to take this through your tree - this needs merging.

The review for 07/14 made me expect an update - perhaps tweak the asm
constraints and add a comment. This can be addressed later, as long as
we don't forget.

However
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250324104702.12139E73-hca@linux.ibm.com
needs to be addressed before a merge. The series in mm.git breaks the
s390 build.