Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] watchdog: sama5d4_wdt: Fix WDDIS handling for SAM9X60 and SAMA7G5

[Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>]

Hi,

On 5/27/26 06:04, Balakrishnan.S@microchip.com wrote:
> Hi Wim,
> 
> Gentle ping — both patches have been reviewed. Could this be queued for
> the next cycle?
> 

Please check linux-next to determine if patches are queued for the next
commit window.

Thanks,
Guenter

> Thanks,
> Balakrishnan
> 
> On 02/03/26 5:03 pm, Balakrishnan Sambath wrote:
>> The sama5d4_wdt driver hardcodes AT91_WDT_WDDIS (bit 15) for WDDIS
>> detection, which is incorrect for SAM9X60 and SAMA7G5 that use bit 12
>> (AT91_SAM9X60_WDDIS). This series fixes the detection by introducing
>> a per-device wddis_mask and documents the bit position difference in
>> the header.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Reorder patches: fix first, documentation second
>> - Drop patch 3/3, not needed with wddis_mask approach
>> - Keep AT91_SAM9X60_* register names, drop _LEGACY/_MODERN naming
>> - Limit header changes to WDDIS comments and datasheet references
>>
>> Balakrishnan Sambath (2):
>>     watchdog: sama5d4_wdt: Fix WDDIS detection on SAM9X60 and SAMA7G5
>>     watchdog: at91sam9_wdt.h: Document WDDIS bit position per SoC family
>>
>>    drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.h |  6 +++--
>>    drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c  | 48 +++++++++++++++------------------
>>    2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>