From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vzapolskiy@gmail.com (Vladimir Zapolskiy) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:35:22 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: MX3: Fixed typo in declared enum type name. In-Reply-To: <20100121092619.GV8970@buzzloop.caiaq.de> References: <1264065172-22494-1-git-send-email-vzapolskiy@gmail.com> <20100121092619.GV8970@buzzloop.caiaq.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org According to this issue I have not met problems with mx31lite board, surely that's just a typo. Anyway I plan to continue to work with this board setup for a while and make some tests of the recent changes found in 2.6.33. On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:12:52PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >> To distinguish between mx31lite and mx31lilly boards better to use >> different enum types. > > True, even though it shouldn't have any impact unless you include both > headers. I assume you didn't meet any real-life problem with that? > >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy > > Acked-by: Daniel Mack > > >> --- >> ?arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/board-mx31lite.h | ? ?2 +- >> ?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/board-mx31lite.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/board-mx31lite.h >> index 0184b63..2b2da03 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/board-mx31lite.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/board-mx31lite.h >> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ >> >> ?#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ >> >> -enum mx31lilly_boards { >> +enum mx31lite_boards { >> ? ? ? MX31LITE_NOBOARD ? ? ? ?= 0, >> ? ? ? MX31LITE_DB ? ? ? ? ? ? = 1, >> ?}; >> -- >> 1.6.5.4 >> >