From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:11:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen In-Reply-To: References: <1484744105-53140-1-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Hanjun Guo >> >> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi >> is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform >> msi support. >> >> For platform device connecting to ITS on arm platform, we have IORT >> table with the named componant node to describe the mappings of paltform >> device and ITS, so we can retrieve the dev id and find its parent >> irqdomain (ITS) from IORT table (simlar with the ACPI ITS support). >> > > I understand that there is a consensus on IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces > of this series while there is some ongoing work on the MBIgen part in > due to dependency on Agustin's patch vs. ACPI definitions. > > Can we merge the IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces to 4.11 so that the base > implementation comes in place? Sorry, but I may be missing something. Which IORT/SMMUv3 patches are we talking about? Do you have a pointer to a series? Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...