public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Conor.Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	soc@kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation/process: add soc maintainer handbook
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 22:29:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe1f44f0-3c6d-4375-6aad-286d6d539d73@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230617-succulent-surgery-3dbbf9454737@spud>

On 17/06/2023 20:32, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey Arnd,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:23:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, at 10:27, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> Arnd suggested that adding a maintainer handbook for the SoC "subsystem"
>>> would be helpful in trying to bring on board maintainers for the various
>>> new platforms cropping up in RISC-V land.
>>>
>>> Add a document briefly describing the role of the SoC subsystem and some
>>> basic advice for (new) platform maintainers.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - sort out a rake of spelling/grammar bits spotted by Randy, apart from
>>>   the one noted as a suggestion
>>> - drop the refs for document filepaths
>>
>> Thanks, I've applied this in the soc/newsoc branch of the soc tree
>> now, which is where I'm already queuing new platforms.
> 
> Having cited this document for the first time, it came to mind that I
> never mentioned putting the submaintainer trees into linux-next. Should
> I send a follow-up patch for that, or do you think that that isn't

This is common maintainer stuff, so every maintainer - not only SoC
related - should ensure his tree is in next. I would trim all such
common things from the document and store it somewhere else, because
otherwise people will just not read it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2023-06-17 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-06  8:27 [PATCH v3] Documentation/process: add soc maintainer handbook Conor Dooley
2023-06-06 10:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-06-17 18:32   ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-17 20:29     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe1f44f0-3c6d-4375-6aad-286d6d539d73@linaro.org \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=soc@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox