From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA386C43334 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 09:50:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=jKZZBC+fnBMzUpCD9vO/nQxHfU3y6hz4Ot2K94+anJo=; b=vi4fuGotyjYENd 7Mn9T4z+n1VqIj6kmBU7J4qCnMll7SdD1S/Ij7gvODBs9QGBO+5AXU9YdEP0fJYefXlLbxspCJxc4 ziltbTAwR3Ef/iaZj/pVAh5oWRJPNSmVrQvS5fNElITM6clGUhkjQpis3xSTYd8IEv8KFfRKo3f7n V8Yh8wzqQTf+akDpKF5beCiWLJIhOA+zjuqs5GwKIlC67eBqRPFiRIbyotCagZLeyYFtM1TelAF67 RIQQOpXc/AzzAEww1hldQP92vcC1JiZr79JbVFwAsIC+eBXHkStUF8hoYCsNEt60DHmIFqEkTAr+y DZOv0ScTJa8CjXg6yWdQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nxmsO-00EDg6-Qp; Sun, 05 Jun 2022 09:48:52 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nxmsK-00EDdK-El for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2022 09:48:50 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB5DD6E; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 02:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.163.37.253] (unknown [10.163.37.253]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 241D53F73D; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 02:48:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 15:18:35 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] openrisc/mm: Enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT Content-Language: en-US To: Stafford Horne Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras , "David S. Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Geert Uytterhoeven , Dinh Nguyen , Jonas Bonn , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220603101411.488970-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <20220603101411.488970-7-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> From: Anshuman Khandual In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220605_024848_580600_F1B7E437 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.51 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 6/5/22 11:37, Stafford Horne wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 03:44:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> This defines and exports a platform specific custom vm_get_page_prot() via >> subscribing ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT. Subsequently all __SXXX and __PXXX >> macros can be dropped which are no longer needed. >> >> Cc: Jonas Bonn >> Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Acked-by: Stafford Horne >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual > > Is it possible to retract my Acked-by? I was following the discussion of this > new function actually being sub optimal. So as far as I am concerned all these > architecture patches should be nak'ed. Sure, alright. I am planning to redo these arch patches via making the protection_map[] array private to the platforms but possibly with a common look up function as Christophe had suggested earlier. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel