From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: woogyom.kim@gmail.com (Milo Kim)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:24:47 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: Remove TPS65217 interrupts
In-Reply-To: <20161212172511.5nj7whzytpkmrk7z@rob-hp-laptop>
References: <20161209062833.5768-1-woogyom.kim@gmail.com>
 <20161209062833.5768-3-woogyom.kim@gmail.com>
 <20161212172511.5nj7whzytpkmrk7z@rob-hp-laptop>
Message-ID: <fe4985c0-d60a-2562-12a7-064404efd64c@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 12/13/2016 02:25 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:28:31PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote:
>> Interrupt numbers are from the datasheet, so no need to keep them in
>> the ABI. Use the number in the DT file.
> I don't see the purpose of ripping this out. The headers have always
> been for convienence, not whether the values come from the datasheet or
> not.

My understanding is it's a same rule as other interrupt controllers.
I'd like to have Arnd's opinion for this.

Best regards,
Milo