From: Prasanna Kumar T S M <ptsm@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
ionela.voinescu@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: sumitg@nvidia.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com, lihuisong@huawei.com,
zhanjie9@hisilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] arm64: Update AMU-based freq scale factor on entering idle
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:15:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe4c48e0-5bc5-4a16-8df2-e848b55c1015@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250121084435.2839280-6-beata.michalska@arm.com>
On 21-01-2025 14:14, Beata Michalska wrote:
> Now that the frequency scale factor has been activated for retrieving
> current frequency on a given CPU, trigger its update upon entering
> idle. This will, to an extent, allow querying last known frequency
> in a non-invasive way. It will also improve the frequency scale factor
> accuracy when a CPU entering idle did not receive a tick for a while.
> As a consequence, for idle cores, the reported frequency will be the
> last one observed before entering the idle state.
>
> Suggested-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 5f5738b174c7..6c43aafac77c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,19 @@ static __always_inline bool amu_fie_cpu_supported(unsigned int cpu)
> cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, amu_fie_cpus);
> }
>
> +void arch_cpu_idle_enter(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> + if (!amu_fie_cpu_supported(cpu))
> + return;
> +
> + /* Kick in AMU update but only if one has not happened already */
> + if (housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) &&
> + time_is_before_jiffies(per_cpu(cpu_amu_samples.last_scale_update, cpu)))
> + amu_scale_freq_tick();
> +}
> +
> #define AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS 20
>
> int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Prasanna Kumar T S M <ptsm@linux.microsoft.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-24 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-21 8:44 [PATCH v9 0/5] Add support for AArch64 AMUv1-based average freq Beata Michalska
2025-01-21 8:44 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] cpufreq: Allow arch_freq_get_on_cpu to return an error Beata Michalska
2025-01-21 10:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-21 15:14 ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-21 18:40 ` Vanshidhar Konda
2025-01-23 21:37 ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-22 6:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-23 21:45 ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-24 3:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-28 8:09 ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-28 8:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-21 10:47 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-24 4:15 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-21 8:44 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] cpufreq: Introduce an optional cpuinfo_avg_freq sysfs entry Beata Michalska
2025-01-21 10:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-21 15:17 ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-22 6:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-23 21:47 ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-24 3:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-01-28 8:43 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-29 11:29 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-01-21 8:44 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] arm64: amu: Delay allocating cpumask for AMU FIE support Beata Michalska
2025-01-24 4:48 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-29 11:17 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-01-21 8:44 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] arm64: Provide an AMU-based version of arch_freq_get_on_cpu Beata Michalska
2025-01-24 4:43 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-28 8:16 ` Beata Michalska
2025-01-28 8:52 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-29 11:15 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-01-21 8:44 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] arm64: Update AMU-based freq scale factor on entering idle Beata Michalska
2025-01-24 4:45 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M [this message]
2025-01-29 11:13 ` Sumit Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe4c48e0-5bc5-4a16-8df2-e848b55c1015@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=ptsm@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).