linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Define wfi(), wfe(), sev() macros for pre-v7 processors
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 14:15:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff8b5b67a8c36c282e54e48d49204781@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b462b6fdb4265f13d0cd87d13df3c530@mail.gmail.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santosh Shilimkar [mailto:santosh.shilimkar at ti.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 2:11 PM
> To: 'Dave Martin'; 'linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org'
> Cc: 'Tony Lindgren'; Jean Pihet-XID; 'linux-omap at vger.kernel.org';
> 'Nicolas Pitre'; 'Russell King'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: Define wfi(), wfe(), sev() macros for pre-
> v7 processors
>
> Dave,
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.martin at linaro.org]
> > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 7:51 PM
> > To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: Dave Martin; Tony Lindgren; Santosh Shilimkar; Jean Pihet;
> > linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; Nicolas Pitre; Russell King
> > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Define wfi(), wfe(), sev() macros for pre-v7
> > processors
> >
> > Pre-v7 processors don't have wfe/sev, so these are defined for
> > consistency as empty barrier asms.
> >
> > For v6, wfi is architected as a defined MCR instruction, so
> > use that definition.
> >
> > Doing a no-op instead of wfi() is probably bad, so for older
> > processors than v6, wfi() is not defined.  If needed, some CPU-
> > specific wfi() will have to be defined elsewhere.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/include/asm/system.h |    7 +++++++
> >  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> > index 97f6d60..0e1cae3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> > @@ -129,7 +129,14 @@ extern unsigned int user_debug;
> >  #define sev()	__asm__ __volatile__ ("sev" : : : "memory")
> >  #define wfe()	__asm__ __volatile__ ("wfe" : : : "memory")
> >  #define wfi()	__asm__ __volatile__ ("wfi" : : : "memory")
> > +#else /* __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 7 */
> > +#define sev()	__asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : : "memory")
> > +#define wfe()	__asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : : "memory")
> This is not true for "CPU_32v6K" extensions, right. I think they do
> support 'sev' and 'wfe' instructions.
>
>
Ignore the comment. 'CPU_32v6K' is already considered.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-08  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-04 14:20 [PATCH] ARM: Define wfi(), wfe(), sev() macros for pre-v7 processors Dave Martin
2011-02-08  8:40 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08  8:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff8b5b67a8c36c282e54e48d49204781@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).