From: chripell@fsfe.org (christian pellegrin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2.6.34-rc2] s3c: Fix GPIOs bank H and J not being preserved during suspend on S3C24XX
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 09:34:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <i2lcabda6421005040034hf27d04f7m95ff2cda9333ff93@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100504070111.GC26401@trinity.fluff.org>
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> wrote:
>
> could you send the gpio fix with the above change as a seperate patch
> please?
>
Yes, no problem, I'll just wait for the "up-comming s3c2410_gpio
fallout" patches so I can test everything with the new functions.
BTW there is a nastiness in mixing old-style s3c24xx gpios and gpiolib
ones for the J port found in the s3c2440. For the former you have to
use S3C241?_GPJ* macros in regs-gpioj.h, for the later S3C2410_GPJ().
The reason of this is the "hole" in GPIO registers address which
breaks S3C2410_GPIO_BASE. So I'm looking forward for your
reorganization of s3c24xx gpio to see if a patch is needed for this.
Right now I'm using:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/include/mach/regs-gpio.h
b/arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/include/mach/regs-gpio.h
index ebc85c6..a2eab90 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/include/mach/regs-gpio.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/include/mach/regs-gpio.h
@@ -37,7 +37,16 @@
S3C2400_BASEC2H(pin)+S3C24XX_VA_GPIO)
-#define S3C2410_GPIO_BASE(pin) ((((pin) & ~31) >> 1) + S3C24XX_VA_GPIO)
+#if !defined(__ASSEMBLER__) && defined(S3C24XX_VA_GPIO)
+static inline void *S3C2410_GPIO_BASE(unsigned int pin)
+{
+ unsigned int off = (pin & ~31) >> 1;
+
+ if ((pin & ~31) == S3C2410_GPIO_J_START)
+ off += 0x50;
+ return S3C24XX_VA_GPIO + off;
+}
+#endif
#define S3C2410_GPIO_OFFSET(pin) ((pin) & 31)
so if I use, by mistake, S3C2410_GPJ() in s3c2410_gpio_cfgpin I don't
shoot myself in the foot. If I understand you intentions S3C241?_GPJ*
will go away after the mentioned patch series. Anyway I wait for your
reorganization of s3c gpios to resubmit these patches if needed.
Thanks,
--
Christian Pellegrin, see http://www.evolware.org/chri/
"Real Programmers don't play tennis, or any other sport which requires
you to change clothes. Mountain climbing is OK, and Real Programmers
wear their climbing boots to work in case a mountain should suddenly
spring up in the middle of the computer room."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-30 8:23 [PATCH v2.6.34-rc2] s3c: Fix GPIOs bank H and J not being preserved during suspend on S3C24XX Christian Pellegrin
2010-04-23 6:33 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-05-04 7:01 ` Ben Dooks
2010-05-04 7:34 ` christian pellegrin [this message]
2010-05-06 5:51 ` Ben Dooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=i2lcabda6421005040034hf27d04f7m95ff2cda9333ff93@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chripell@fsfe.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).