From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C6CC433E7 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44DFD20714 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="boiIG067" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 44DFD20714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:In-reply-to:Subject:To: From:References:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=tTzpmWPFDf1VLIeeC8ORK+f5ihlfnPO8ibnx3TiyhLs=; b=boiIG067p6sXM22zH+d6bdEct 9mc90iRcMiml3h04VGcRnkZvOlZGX5Kvq0WFFNgG/sj61qiRu24l+yen5lKsklVIcXOytW1hXIU6R +PPu8XVU+PCNJzySVhzZM1kvwjwRM8sVE8JIYPx1DRC1piInW9L7lku+SsyUrpCWgOnJqjE0ZNqoT 7m461BVOuVwk+PWER+zS1DrM9m9dctp3C/rnWLOCoPzWb01AGhqa0JLhXM+1NikykItp+/L+hg0EN N4EtAFthI9CFvI94AJLyTFbz1w9QH+gmiEY3dEehf2mY7lIp0RvM5WVJW7/WeonQs5Yiv/rsg2mF+ V+0/GkHHA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kRxiA-00045A-9H; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:17:58 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kRxi5-000432-UI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:17:55 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B05D6E; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 06:17:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DB4E3F66B; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 06:17:50 -0700 (PDT) References: <20200424135657.32519-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20200603170511.GA23722@bogus> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.3 From: Valentin Schneider To: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] firmware/psci: PSCI checker cleanup In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:17:44 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201012_091754_029071_06B5DA95 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.57 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Lorenzo Pieralisi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On 03/06/20 18:39, Valentin Schneider wrote: > On 03/06/20 18:05, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 02:56:55PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> This is a small cleanup of the PSCI checker following Peter's objections >>> to its homegrown do_idle() implementation. It is based on his >>> sched_setscheduler() unexport series at [1]. >>> >>> I've never really used the thing before, but it still seems to behave >>> correctly on my Juno r0 & HiKey960. >>> >> >> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla >> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla > > Thanks! > > AIUI the plan is to have the base in for the following version, so we > can wait until then - or I can rebase this on top of mainline, and > whoever will be on the receiving end of the merge conflict will be > slightly annoyed :-) > > I'm in no particular rush, and this isn't very hot code, so up to you. > The sched_setscheduler() series is in 5.9. Patches apply cleanly atop 5.9, and I double-checked on my Juno that they still actually work :-) > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel