From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khc@pm.waw.pl (Krzysztof Halasa) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:30:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S In-Reply-To: <1253089566.3273.152.camel@linux-1lbu> (Steve Chen's message of "Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:26:06 -0500") References: <1252875960-21512-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20090915103739.GA19519@elf.ucw.cz> <1253017761.3273.117.camel@linux-1lbu> <200909151541.08852.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <1253032210.3273.128.camel@linux-1lbu> <94a0d4530909151158y489a96e3x63ff932c713822b0@mail.gmail.com> <1253043875.3273.131.camel@linux-1lbu> <1253053609.3273.139.camel@linux-1lbu> <1253089566.3273.152.camel@linux-1lbu> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Steve Chen writes: > +config OLD_CPU_DELAY > + depends on CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T > + bool "Accurate delays for some older CPUs" > + def_bool n > + help > + Try enable this if observing longer than expected delays and need > + more accuracy. May cause instability in some CPUs. > + There is still this uncertain "accurate" in the text. Why don't just + bool "Different delay() code for some older CPUs" -- Krzysztof Halasa