From: rabin@rab.in (Rabin Vincent)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] spinlock: don't use deprecated barriers on ARMv7
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:36:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.172.1264441826.2170.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> (raw)
On ARMv7, the use of the cp15 operations for barriers is deprecated in
favour of the isb, dsb, and dmb instructions. Change the locking
functions to use the appropriate type of dsb for the architecture being
built for.
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h
index c91c64c..17eb355 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -5,6 +5,22 @@
#error SMP not supported on pre-ARMv6 CPUs
#endif
+static inline void dsb_sev(void)
+{
+#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 7
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "dsb\n"
+ "sev"
+ );
+#elif defined(CONFIG_CPU_32v6K)
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 4\n"
+ "sev"
+ : : "r" (0)
+ );
+#endif
+}
+
/*
* ARMv6 Spin-locking.
*
@@ -69,13 +85,11 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
__asm__ __volatile__(
" str %1, [%0]\n"
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_32v6K
-" mcr p15, 0, %1, c7, c10, 4\n" /* DSB */
-" sev"
-#endif
:
: "r" (&lock->lock), "r" (0)
: "cc");
+
+ dsb_sev();
}
/*
@@ -132,13 +146,11 @@ static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
__asm__ __volatile__(
"str %1, [%0]\n"
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_32v6K
-" mcr p15, 0, %1, c7, c10, 4\n" /* DSB */
-" sev\n"
-#endif
:
: "r" (&rw->lock), "r" (0)
: "cc");
+
+ dsb_sev();
}
/* write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed? */
@@ -188,14 +200,12 @@ static inline void arch_read_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
" strex %1, %0, [%2]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_32v6K
-"\n cmp %0, #0\n"
-" mcreq p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 4\n"
-" seveq"
-#endif
: "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (tmp2)
: "r" (&rw->lock)
: "cc");
+
+ if (tmp == 0)
+ dsb_sev();
}
static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
--
1.6.6
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-11 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-11 15:06 Rabin Vincent [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-13 15:45 [PATCH] spinlock: don't use deprecated barriers on ARMv7 Rabin Vincent
2010-01-24 20:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-25 17:50 ` Rabin Vincent
2010-01-25 18:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.172.1264441826.2170.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--to=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).