From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: s3c64xx: PM: Mask and acknowledge all UART interrupts during core resume.
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:21:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.43.1311955510.20020.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> (raw)
On some boards (in my case Tiny6410 from FriendlyARM), after waking up from
sleep mode, UART controllers are left in an unclean state with interrupt
status bits set. After reenabling interrupts the system starts to get
hammered by infinite UART interrupts, which cannot be acknowledged, because
of disabled UART bus clock. You can imagine the outcome.
This patch deals with the issue by reenabling the bus clock in PCLK mask
temporarily, acknowledging and masking all the UART interrupts and then
restoring the original PCLK mask value, before interrupts get enabled.
Alternatively, the issue could be avoided by moving all the UART interrupt
handling to the S3C UART driver and disabling the IRQ on port suspend.
Could anyone explain me what is the benefit of having the UART IRQ managed
by the generic IRQ infrastructure, while it is used only by a single driver?
---
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c
index bc1c470..799a212 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c
@@ -16,12 +16,14 @@
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <linux/serial_core.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <mach/map.h>
#include <mach/irqs.h>
#include <plat/pm.h>
#include <plat/wakeup-mask.h>
+#include <plat/regs-serial.h>
#include <mach/regs-sys.h>
#include <mach/regs-gpio.h>
@@ -93,12 +95,36 @@ void s3c_pm_configure_extint(void)
void s3c_pm_restore_core(void)
{
+ u32 pclkgate, tmp;
+ int i;
+
__raw_writel(0, S3C64XX_EINT_MASK);
s3c_pm_debug_smdkled(1 << 2, 0);
s3c_pm_do_restore_core(core_save, ARRAY_SIZE(core_save));
s3c_pm_do_restore(misc_save, ARRAY_SIZE(misc_save));
+
+ tmp = pclkgate = __raw_readl(S3C_PCLK_GATE);
+
+ /* re-start uart clocks */
+ tmp |= S3C_CLKCON_PCLK_UART0;
+ tmp |= S3C_CLKCON_PCLK_UART1;
+ tmp |= S3C_CLKCON_PCLK_UART2;
+ tmp |= S3C_CLKCON_PCLK_UART3;
+
+ __raw_writel(tmp, S3C_PCLK_GATE);
+
+ udelay(10);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
+ __raw_writel(15, S3C_VA_UARTx(i) + S3C64XX_UINTM);
+ __raw_writel(15, S3C_VA_UARTx(i) + S3C64XX_UINTP);
+ }
+
+ udelay(10);
+
+ __raw_writel(pclkgate, S3C_PCLK_GATE);
}
void s3c_pm_save_core(void)
--
1.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 20:21 Tomasz Figa [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-29 15:50 [PATCH 0/5] Miscellaneous s3c64xx fixes Tomasz Figa
2011-07-29 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: s3c64xx: PM: Mask and acknowledge all UART interrupts during core resume Tomasz Figa
2011-08-13 11:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2011-08-19 5:24 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.43.1311955510.20020.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).