From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/15] ARM: perf: remove active_mask
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:37:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.74.1313415781.20020.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> (raw)
Currently, pmu_hw_events::active_mask is used to keep track of which
events are active in hardware. As we can stop counters and their
interrupts, this is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 8 --------
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 3 ---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c | 6 ------
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index dfde928..438482f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -57,12 +57,6 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
* an event. A 0 means that the counter can be used.
*/
unsigned long used_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS)];
-
- /*
- * A 1 bit for an index indicates that the counter is actively being
- * used.
- */
- unsigned long active_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS)];
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events);
@@ -295,7 +289,6 @@ armpmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
WARN_ON(idx < 0);
- clear_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask);
armpmu_stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);
cpuc->events[idx] = NULL;
clear_bit(idx, cpuc->used_mask);
@@ -327,7 +320,6 @@ armpmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
event->hw.idx = idx;
armpmu->disable(hwc, idx);
cpuc->events[idx] = event;
- set_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask);
hwc->state = PERF_HES_STOPPED | PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
if (flags & PERF_EF_START)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c
index 87f29b5..8390128 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c
@@ -462,6 +462,23 @@ armv6pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc,
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu_lock, flags);
}
+static int counter_is_active(unsigned long pmcr, int idx)
+{
+ unsigned long mask = 0;
+ if (idx == ARMV6_CYCLE_COUNTER)
+ mask = ARMV6_PMCR_CCOUNT_IEN;
+ else if (idx == ARMV6_COUNTER0)
+ mask = ARMV6_PMCR_COUNT0_IEN;
+ else if (idx == ARMV6_COUNTER1)
+ mask = ARMV6_PMCR_COUNT1_IEN;
+
+ if (mask)
+ return pmcr & mask;
+
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "invalid counter number (%d)\n", idx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static irqreturn_t
armv6pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num,
void *dev)
@@ -491,7 +508,7 @@ armv6pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num,
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
- if (!test_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask))
+ if (!counter_is_active(pmcr, idx))
continue;
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
index fe6c931..f4170fc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
@@ -1022,9 +1022,6 @@ static irqreturn_t armv7pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
- if (!test_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask))
- continue;
-
/*
* We have a single interrupt for all counters. Check that
* each counter has overflowed before we process it.
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c
index 54312fc..ca89a06 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c
@@ -253,9 +253,6 @@ xscale1pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
- if (!test_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask))
- continue;
-
if (!xscale1_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(pmnc, idx))
continue;
@@ -585,9 +582,6 @@ xscale2pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
- if (!test_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask))
- continue;
-
if (!xscale2_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(pmnc, idx))
continue;
--
1.7.0.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 8:37 Mark Rutland [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-15 13:55 [RFC PATCH 00/15] ARM: perf: support multiple PMUs Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] ARM: perf: remove active_mask Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.74.1313415781.20020.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).