[PATCH 10/10] mmp: append device support in jasper

[haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang)]

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mark Brown
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 08:23:24AM -0400, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>
>> +static struct regulator_consumer_supply regulator_supply[] = {
>
> You shouldn't have all your consumer supplies in one big array, each
> regulator should have its own set of supplies for the devices connected
> to it.
>
>> + ? ? [MAX8925_ID_SD1] ? ? ? ?= REGULATOR_SUPPLY("v_sd1", NULL),
>> + ? ? [MAX8925_ID_SD2] ? ? ? ?= REGULATOR_SUPPLY("v_sd2", NULL),
>> + ? ? [MAX8925_ID_SD3] ? ? ? ?= REGULATOR_SUPPLY("v_sd3", NULL),
>> + ? ? [MAX8925_ID_LDO1] ? ? ? = REGULATOR_SUPPLY("v_ldo1", NULL),
>> + ? ? [MAX8925_ID_LDO2] ? ? ? = REGULATOR_SUPPLY("v_ldo2", NULL),
>
> None of these supplies should be being defined at all - the supplies
> from regulators are for hooking up individual device supplies to the
> regulators, you should only have supplies with null devices in
> exceptional cases like CPUfreq where no usable struct device exists.
>
> I'm fairly sure this has been pointed out with regard to previous
> machines you have submitted regulator support for, it is disappointing
> to see the same issue coming up again.
>
>> +#define REG_INIT(_name, _min, _max, _always, _boot) ? ? ? ? ?\
>> +{ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?\
>> + ? ? .constraints = { ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?\
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .name ? ? ? ? ? = __stringify(_name), ? ? ? ? ? \
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .min_uV ? ? ? ? = _min, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? \
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .max_uV ? ? ? ? = _max, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? \
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .always_on ? ? ?= _always, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?\
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .boot_on ? ? ? ?= _boot, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?\
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .valid_ops_mask = REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE, ? ? \
>> + ? ? }, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?\
>> + ? ? .num_consumer_supplies ?= 1, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?\
>> + ? ? .consumer_supplies ? ? ?= &regulator_supply[MAX8925_ID_##_name], \
>
> This macro shouldn't be assuming that there are devices being supplied,
> and definitely needs to be able to cope with more than one regulator
> using the supply.
>
>> +static struct regulator_init_data regulator_data[] = {
>> + ? ? [MAX8925_ID_SD1] = REG_INIT(SD1, 637500, 1425000, 0, 0),
>> + ? ? [MAX8925_ID_SD2] = REG_INIT(SD2, 650000, 2225000, 1, 1),
>> + ? ? [MAX8925_ID_SD3] = REG_INIT(SD3, 750000, 3900000, 1, 1),
>> + ? ? [MAX8925_ID_LDO1] = REG_INIT(LDO1, 750000, 3900000, 1, 1),
>> + ? ? [MAX8925_ID_LDO2] = REG_INIT(LDO2, 650000, 2250000, 1, 1),
>
> Have all the voltage ranges you're specifying here been audited against
> the board design? ?It would be very unusual for every single supply on
> the board have such wide voltage ranges - it looks awfully like the
> ranges here are the supported ranges for the regulators themselves.
>

OK. Update this patch by removing regulators in max8925. They'll be
contained in later patches. Whatever I think a big array is suitable
for unused regulators. Is it right?

Thanks
Haojian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0010--ARM-mmp-append-device-support-in-jasper.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3053 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20100428/7006a778/attachment-0001.bin>