From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mina86@mina86.com (Michal Nazarewicz) Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:25:49 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value In-Reply-To: <1325600353-10895-1-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com> References: <1325600353-10895-1-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:19:04 +0100, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > on_each_cpu() returns as its own return value the return value of > smp_call_function(). smp_call_function() in turn returns a hard > coded value of zero. > > Some callers to on_each_cpu() waste cycles and bloat code space > by checking the return value to on_each_cpu(), probably for > historical reasons. > > This patch set refactors callers to not test on_each_cpu() > (fixed) return value and then refactors on_each_cpu to > return void to avoid confusing future users. > > In other words, this patch aims to delete 18 source code lines > while not changing any functionality :-) > > I tested as best as I could the x86 changes and compiled some > of the others, but I don't have access to all the needed hardware > for testing. Reviewers and testers welcome! Other then the lack of Signed-off-by in the patches, looks good to me, even though personally I'd choose a bottom-up approach, ie. make smp_call_function() return void and from that conclude that on_each_cpu() can return void. With those patches, we have a situation, where smp_call_function() has a return value which is then lost for no immediately apparent reason lost in on_each_cpu(). -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Micha? ?mina86? Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +------------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--