From: arend@broadcom.com (Arend van Spriel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] drivers: brcmaxi: provide amba axi functionality in separate module
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:07:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.vuecahou3ri7v4@arend-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinUWNvkigqkOQeYsyaAKnVXOCji8w@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:33:21 +0200, Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 21 April 2011 16:38, Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> Would it be possible to make chipcommon driver optional (not doing the
>> initialization)?
>
> This would need to be done on a per-device/bus basis, at least for
> embedded. Consider the following setup (which is quite common for dual
> band routers):
>
> BCM4718 (bus A)
+- MIPS74k
> +- Common Core <- provides flash write access, GPIOs, watchdog, ...
> +- 802.11 Core <- for 2.4Ghz wifi
> +- PCIe Core
> + BCM43224 (bus B)
> +- Common Core
> +- 802.11 Core <- for 5Ghz wifi
>
> (I omitted any cores not relevant for the example)
The MIPS may be relevant as well ;-)
In the example above I would expect two axi bus driver instances for bus A
and bus B.
> So eventually you want to able to drive both 802.11 cores, but can't
> exclusively claim both common cores.
I would expect to be probed twice. One call for 2.4GHz 802.11 core
referencing to bus A and one call for 5GHz 802.11 core referencing to bus
B.
Regarding chipcommon I agree that it requires one init sequence per
device. I would just like to have the option to provide a custom
initialization function for chip common (and possibly pcie) somehow.
Gr. AvS
--
"The world is indeed comic, but the joke is on mankind." ? H.P. Lovecraft
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-23 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 20:34 [PATCH] drivers: brcmaxi: provide amba axi functionality in separate module Arend van Spriel
2011-04-21 14:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-21 14:38 ` Arend van Spriel
2011-04-21 14:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-23 12:33 ` Jonas Gorski
2011-04-23 15:07 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.vuecahou3ri7v4@arend-laptop \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).