[PATCH 08/10] mm: cma: Contiguous Memory Allocator added

[mina86@mina86.com (Michal Nazarewicz)]

> On Tuesday 14 June 2011 18:58:35 Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> Is having support for multiple regions a bad thing?  Frankly,
>> removing this support will change code from reading context passed
>> as argument to code reading context from global variable.  Nothing
>> is gained; functionality is lost.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:30:07 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> What is bad IMHO is making them the default, which forces the board
> code to care about memory management details. I would much prefer
> to have contiguous allocation parameters tuned automatically to just
> work on most boards before we add ways to do board-specific hacks.

I see those as orthogonal problems.  The code can have support for
multiple contexts but by default use a single global context exported
as cma_global variable (or some such).

And I'm not arguing against having ?contiguous allocation parameters
tuned automatically to just work on most boards?.  I just don't see
the reason to delete functionality that is already there, does not
add much code and can be useful.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@google.com>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--