From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kaloz@openwrt.org (Imre Kaloz) Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 23:21:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: support XZ compressed kernels In-Reply-To: <20110708210407.GY4812@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1310033999-25617-1-git-send-email-kaloz@openwrt.org> <20110708203832.GV4812@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110708210407.GY4812@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 23:04:07 +0200, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:54:29PM +0200, Imre Kaloz wrote: >> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:38:32 +0200, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:19:59PM +0200, Imre Kaloz wrote: >>>> # Make sure files are removed during clean >>>> -extra-y += piggy.gzip piggy.lzo piggy.lzma lib1funcs.S >>>> +extra-y += piggy.gzip piggy.lzo piggy.lzma piggy.xzkern lib1funcs.S ashldi3.S >>> >>> Is there a reason the suffix is xzkern rather than just xz ? >> >> We do "$(call if_changed,$(suffix_y))" and scripts/Makefile.lib >> uses cmd_xzkern. I think keeping the changes minimal worth more >> then having the proper suffix for a temporary file. > > Hmm, that's unfortunate. It seems that it may be a non-standard format > so I guess that's reasonable. No further comments then. > Indeed. After the .gitignore modification, should I resend it here or it can go into the patch system? Imre