From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mina86@mina86.com (Michal Nazarewicz) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:36:42 +0100 Subject: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCHv23 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator In-Reply-To: References: <1329929337-16648-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:34:02 +0100, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/2/29 Michal Nazarewicz : >> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:35:42 +0100, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote: >>> and i also write a simple kernel helper to test the CMA: >> Would it make sense to make a patch out of it putting it to tools/cma (or >> similar)? > i can send a patch for this. i am just thinking, should it be placed > in tools/ as a test utility or Documents/ as an example to explain CMA > to users who want to use cma. I'd put it in tools/. > i also think we should have a seperate document to explain cma in details > in documents/, and my helper program can be placed there. I'm currently writing an article for LWN which I hope will also lead to something worth putting in Documentation/. -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Micha? ?mina86? Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +------------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--