From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric.y.miao@gmail.com (Eric Miao) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:11:35 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] SA1100: add processor check to sa1110-cpufreq driver In-Reply-To: <1271875749-2891-3-git-send-email-mad_soft@inbox.ru> References: <1271875749-2891-1-git-send-email-mad_soft@inbox.ru> <1271875749-2891-3-git-send-email-mad_soft@inbox.ru> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote: > Just to make sure that this driver won't run on StrongArm SA1100 > when both SA1100 and SA1110 cpufreq drivers are built in (usually > in multimachine config). SA1100 driver already has similar check. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Artamonow Looks correct to me as well. > --- > ?arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c | ? ?3 +++ > ?1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c > index 63b32b6..7252874 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c > @@ -363,6 +363,9 @@ static int __init sa1110_clk_init(void) > ? ? ? ?struct sdram_params *sdram; > ? ? ? ?const char *name = sdram_name; > > + ? ? ? if (!cpu_is_sa1110()) > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -ENODEV; > + > ? ? ? ?if (!name[0]) { > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (machine_is_assabet()) > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?name = "TC59SM716-CL3"; > -- > 1.7.0.4 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >