From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mina86@mina86.com (Michal Nazarewicz) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:00:48 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3] DMA, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework In-Reply-To: <1401757919-30018-3-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> References: <1401757919-30018-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <1401757919-30018-3-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework, > so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-contiguous.h b/include/linux/dma-contiguous.h > index dfb1dc9..ecb85ac 100644 > --- a/include/linux/dma-contiguous.h > +++ b/include/linux/dma-contiguous.h > @@ -53,9 +53,10 @@ > > #ifdef __KERNEL__ > > +#include > + Why is this suddenly required? > struct cma; > struct page; > -struct device; > > #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_CMA -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Micha? ?mina86? Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +------ooO--(_)--Ooo--