From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Kameron Carr <kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/11] coco: guest: arm64: Hook TSM accept to Realm TDISP RUN transition
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:17:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5aik4yx0uo.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f086f940-edaa-4bd5-ba11-e52e61fd6cee@linux.microsoft.com>
Kameron Carr <kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com> writes:
> On 4/27/2026 1:28 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
...
>
>> + /*
>> + * Present the private mmio range in the resource hierarchy.
>> + * We don't use this for ioremap, ioremap check the RIPAS value.
>> + */
>> + ret = pci_tsm_mmio_setup(pdev, tsm_mmio);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pci_err(pdev, "Protected mmio setup failure\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = cca_map_evidence_report_range(pdev, tsm_mmio);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pci_err(pdev, "failed to validate the interface report\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = rhi_vdev_set_tdi_state(pdev, RHI_DA_TDI_CONFIG_RUN);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pci_err(pdev, "failed to switch the device (%u) to RUN state\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> After calling pci_tsm_mmio_setup() we have mappings from insert_resource()
> then failures from later return codes never call mmio_teardown() so
> remove_resource() is never called, only kfree on the tsm_mmio.
>
> Likewise after cca_map_evidence_report_range() the mmio entry memory ranges
> have state RIPAS_DEV. Later failures never restore RIPAS_EMPTY.
>
> Could clean up be handled better? Is there a reason these failures don't
> have a rollback path?
>
Thanks for the review. I’ll incorporate these changes in the next
version.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 8:27 [RFC PATCH v4 00/11] coco/TSM: Arm CCA guest TDISP lock/accept flow with verification and DMA enable Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/11] coco: guest: arm64: Guest TSM callback and realm device lock support Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/11] coco: guest: arm64: Fix a typo in the ARM_CCA_GUEST Kconfig help string ("and" -> "an") Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add Realm Host Interface and guest DA helper Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-21 3:42 ` Kameron Carr
2026-04-27 8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/11] coco: guest: arm64: Support guest-initiated TDI lock/unlock transitions Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/11] coco: guest: arm64: Refresh interface-report cache during device lock Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add measurement refresh via RHI_DA_VDEV_GET_MEASUREMENTS Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add guest APIs to read host-cached DA objects Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-18 17:43 ` Kameron Carr
2026-08-20 11:13 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-27 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/11] coco: guest: arm64: Verify DA evidence with RSI_VDEV_GET_INFO digests Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-19 16:43 ` Kameron Carr
2026-08-20 11:18 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-27 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/11] coco: guest: arm64: Hook TSM accept to Realm TDISP RUN transition Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-24 22:28 ` Kameron Carr
2026-08-25 4:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2026-04-27 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/11] coco: arm64: dma: Update force_dma_unencrypted for accepted devices Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/11] coco: guest: arm64: Enable vdev DMA after attestation Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq5aik4yx0uo.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox