From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B26F5C98302 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 05:06:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=5Bt5dcvEtscZwbFsTWKayy1TU+NMdGF6W9YAquY9XwI=; b=0Qrw5J3kZQhNOMlhDNYFWz9yEG Pwv+mNuHIE+gWuBXOy+SaTXtWNJoEpXfWZvdtD0D6V2EOP9TnxJLYH87IFAIZuAcWxg0WUmubS1Nj 4sF+nObRKZ6nDDABk5TwebOiNnnq09qFyA74iRuKJdoUyvc9LN7M+JpSQ0/q0uIbqQ6o2v1wVSqCZ J5s36URtKr5AHly9CEPB15FN+Q93jb2Mrd+6QolAIY5MSUb5ucVLnZDGSnBJC9X9ow3Ogd8QtzRdu C65ZsHJZhGSO93IgVlM2ijXA0bMRZR+mCLGfhey+ta7tgGj84Qc9Y6GqUeEhEqBcs+YHgZ+/CTK50 JjFyl9+A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x9FB4-000000079tl-0FyQ; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 05:05:54 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x9FB3-000000079tf-0LK8 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 05:05:53 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674AA600AA; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 05:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79C081F000FF; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 05:05:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790139952; bh=5Bt5dcvEtscZwbFsTWKayy1TU+NMdGF6W9YAquY9XwI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=m4pTLW9/ipMMEsohyLQEKqXjzHcwkN0abxqiFKnpytgFKVUrqceMZuAAbjlrBMffF CdO1sqCGy/I+4fa+zUShWoTBNHwKuZyGA0wUgCZuN/1qgzhc19lMpVXwyE3kopIDPh xsaF5GYCT9jld3YBh7sBjzHUGLsx/yj0S9EyAhn3oG6QwlUWCR4A3ADfsDf0GA8d70 LLyo/WDzrdcRjJT3saEv0417Vyorzdv9KtCxM/YNHdqRTmqIJwT5iDboIP2AvVAhAl 9BI9XEA2qlyxB1A/jRfmI8xO2B26EOiIXB5Dudw7TzaVJ3eh185kcBwpIEV1sD+FUg BVMT6WrzF0mJg== X-Mailer: emacs 31.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) From: Aneesh Kumar K.V To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Christian K?nig , linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Steven Price , Suzuki K Poulose , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , Sumit Semwal , "T.J. Mercier" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/9] dma-buf: system_heap: Enforce shared-granule alignment for cc-shared buffers In-Reply-To: References: <20260918153642.GD11599@ziepe.ca> <20260918165315.GF11599@ziepe.ca> <6115eaf7-21bc-49ce-8a74-08fd37a1e2c9@amd.com> <20260921115141.GJ11599@ziepe.ca> <45dd7a2f-8474-4388-b383-2dee3ee62206@amd.com> <20260921121739.GM11599@ziepe.ca> <20260921123725.GN11599@ziepe.ca> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:35:44 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Catalin Marinas writes: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 08:56:41PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> Jason Gunthorpe writes: >> >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Christian Knig wrote: >> > >> >> I also don't see where mem_cc_shared_granule_size is added? >> > >> > Patch 1: >> > >> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260904103452.1197239-2-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org/ >> > >> > Aneesh, please be sure to use get_maintainers on series like this so >> > everyone gets cc'd. >> >> For v7, I included only the maintainer entries because the recipient >> list was getting too long, but I added the mailing lists. > > I could not see Christian in the recipients of v7. Sometimes the list cc > is enough but my inbox for example is already around 4000 new email, so > easy to miss. > He is already on the Cc list for v7. > > Recommendation: add Cc: lines to each patch with the people that must > ack your changes (the maintainers for those specific patches). You can > then collate all the cc's from your patches, add them to the cover > letter and use --cc-cover with git send-email. > I'll do this > > Of course, the list can get large. You can then make a call with who to > drop: colleagues you talk to regularly can be skipped for example, maybe > reviewers if there are too many for a subsystem. I would not drop people > that gave you feedback already on a previous version and not the > maintainers you need acks from (you can drop them if they already acked > your patches). > sure. -aneesh