From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F315C44501 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:52:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc: To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=+C5nG+xtG3hyYyQwRUQFGYH75JNuc0Lk0Ty5BqRmWNU=; b=LSSBh8PZexlimryl324MUCR/ln 59WV5Ei7naRzRdRVvyWfnO0+xHJ5p7V2uyD2oRyKIF9wLIyOPCC7Qmded416sLPfbmisP3emkBqVV 1fx9bL84v7xixbNBDL1OLNVxrDglvurWFtE8PtY5TA9HEnzUEbCBZm00h4vrRvQvlf1/R3B4Y5APo yDnXMJY2/XgqU3f3PSo3nSnmnpYxj3tcGMIUfKvKlkjbrqv7Fq7uhvpEP27zAtlxfXuD7iWAD3TET Ga5bX9+cXTZPkSuL4w7rGvuec+IyWho/FPpeLDROjkaMbCE/Bgwb3PwKfNHQqtSNKo4Y1Shm9n1rU +V0qNJ+w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wjZog-0000000BVJt-2v99; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:52:42 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wjZof-0000000BVJn-3eic for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:52:41 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBCD601EC; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 232391F00A3A; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:52:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784022760; bh=+C5nG+xtG3hyYyQwRUQFGYH75JNuc0Lk0Ty5BqRmWNU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ZgSMxxsh1Lu8MR5Z6WZ7OI+nq6F3YqTn9IBm2AINDs8o2Z/nh/SpZWcv4glu+VhPe cXy87Qxg3XbvgFKPnL50ydX2ZmeXZ+Y2m0e04PAZRMRDiI7yd819Ia6OkzoYI4l8hi bQ5nmUAEKOPB1JNlOSIgfbjVYFEy/Nt7TJrcZZrSwXI52rztJjb2qGdZlVK+Mik1C2 MqZlsgx86ioBdN1tVdskpyUDQ5X3kf6HF+H7N5Qp+yw+MWEZGk2dutdazlT0Q42W8G 2WBALzw60ZoYjzJMEjfOp8k80iBpzrMV5Er054iRnji2EAX6IYZOtyYaIq4WMAy0e3 LsRNlLUiQVPTA== X-Mailer: emacs 30.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) From: Aneesh Kumar K.V To: Marek Szyprowski , Jason Gunthorpe Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, Robin Murphy , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Steven Price , Suzuki K Poulose , Catalin Marinas , Jiri Pirko , Mostafa Saleh , Petr Tesarik , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Dan Williams , Xu Yilun , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , Alexander Gordeev , Gerald Schaefer , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] dma-mapping: Track shared DMA state through direct, pool and swiotlb paths In-Reply-To: References: <20260701054926.825925-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> <20260713194323.GC3133966@ziepe.ca> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:22:27 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Marek Szyprowski writes: > On 13.07.2026 21:43, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 03:03:48PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >>> I'm fine with merging on top of=C2=A0the topic branch and I assume that= this >>> patchset is mature enough to give it a try in linux-next, but first I >>> would like to get a review or at least acks from others with good CC >>> knowledge or experience. >> I think it is good to go from a CC perspective, there are still some >> more items to fix up (like the MMIO) but I'd rather they be followups >> at this point. > > Great. Aneesh, any chance You could send v8 with the remaining items > fixed till end of this week? I will be happy to push it to > dma-mapping-for-next for testing in linux-next asap. > Sure. You need this rebased on top of the pKVM changes, right? Otherwise, we'll end up with conflicts when you do the final pull request. -aneesh