From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8133AC5AC82 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:35:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=isdQD57jHgyTIBMiE4dTMqFI8UmNUWzlh68yHBIB5NU=; b=uiVSv/bGRJRh/7H+45E25aDfX/ 0eYTHt8ZJaOg09m14ZfVrSdD/K5e5aOCk6IeOJO2N8z1qK0emb4bVl5ypi00Tp2Y+KBn+Klg44yJJ Vz0VrzN7nDEJsiGXhoKz3rz6ZA+mLF73aEOyHQguVX4gH9m06rYLJa3qNqXRrnlXpa4IGRV+GyfaT 98I8KcHz4AXlttzHVfMX7peoXDDpir3YC9Ax0sY7YbG/0hnPaXKfNsM1YQkQOwgARq0MPugsHsIYh qr9pvFUc1douXdUy8gaQEhQO3WSkkIE69EFfezsF/HF+eyeG9pdUZzUhm4T7dVLlrLhoTz324I0RW av36fvgw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wtMPe-0000000BPm8-0WSl; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:35:18 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wtMPd-0000000BPm1-1ReH for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:35:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8EE41750; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74A541F000E9; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:35:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786354516; bh=isdQD57jHgyTIBMiE4dTMqFI8UmNUWzlh68yHBIB5NU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=PxxHfsMCqLn69dXi7Q0/a6J1VN4E06pelY/bq5MnIpTAIrUMbYQ5Kal2P8gowM4kg o0PkCyUO1VdmJVmk2KCmrSeCIHECwptAOjDeuZGIfD9d0oL5CLrHP0knXiA7Gl34VE 88rZa367wzgb/WMhb6fn/5SgUPhnH9mycFWs9KyMDTEL8y2YZ0XrpoFsMk/y4+iQ2J POUI21hFg1EKr8VXjWsXvpzUD7y3tEjJodbsWGODgxUrx2JqRpKrmo+ES29fzXgXv3 MRvwENCmYa3p4Ev5huNbaqJzNfMakFdDilbXItljAC/9sWKYEMZsQ1C8s5hBTFoeLj AvjdizNpAnTuQ== X-Mailer: emacs 30.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) From: Aneesh Kumar K.V To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , Jeremy Linton , Jonathan Cameron , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Steven Price , Suzuki K Poulose , Andre Przywara Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] Switch Arm SMCCC firmware services to an SMCCC bus In-Reply-To: References: <20260805063255.1638614-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 15:05:08 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Aneesh Kumar K.V writes: > Catalin Marinas writes: > >> On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 12:02:48PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote: >>> Changes from v8: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260707081351.1680209-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org >>> * Rebase onto the arm64 for-next/core branch. >> >> Was there a dependency on anything in for-next/core? We normally apply >> series on their own branch on top of the vanilla kernel (e.g. 7.2-rc3) >> and merge everything together in for-next/core. We (and many other >> maintainers) strongly prefer series posted on top of an -rc kernel >> (typically -rc1 to -rc3) unless there's a dependency on a different >> branch. Never based on -next or -next like branches (which is what >> for-next/core is, as the name implies). >> > > The reason is that these two patches create conflicts. Since this series > involves file movement, resolving those conflicts was not > straightforward. Therefore, I rebased the series on top of both of the > following commits: > > commit 24f55f511b9e ("virt: arm-cca-guest: use migrate_disable() for attestation token requests") > commit e62decaf98e7 ("arm64/coco: Add pKVM as a CC platform") > Any chance of getting this picked up for the next merge window? A few patch series depend on this patch: 1. The rest of the CCA DA series 2. LFA: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260706134455.132091-1-andre.przywara@arm.com 3. Realm support for Hyper-V: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260625173500.1995481-1-kameroncarr@linux.microsoft.com -aneesh