From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mans@mansr.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=)
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:32:40 +0000
Subject: RFC on cpufreq implementation
In-Reply-To: <54D162B6.2050602@free.fr> (Mason's message of "Tue, 03 Feb 2015
 16:07:18 -0800")
References: <54B7F7CD.7030903@free.fr> <54CA6327.5070707@free.fr>
 <CAKohponrzDb4ZGvRtJ5jtGTPAy4RCfRsYGvdjR5fx51K2=evCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <54CC174F.10703@free.fr>
 <CAKohpomzCEjXUrxUJjypaA77=r4j_ZPa+x3gM=cNN0kc3ux0uQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <54D162B6.2050602@free.fr>
Message-ID: <yw1xlhkea53r.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Mason <mpeg.blue@free.fr> writes:

> Are you saying that use of DeviceTree is mandatory for new ARM ports?

Yes.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com