From: mans@mansr.com (Måns Rullgård)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Removal of NWFPE in its entirety, and VFP emulation code
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:18:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1xmwt68whw.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130410104002.GF14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:40:02 +0100")
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> The situation with VFP is likely less disruptive - only instructions
> which aren't implemented in hardware (or, for example, if you ask for
> inexact exceptions to be enabled) which are bounced to the software
> support code will be affected. I think OMAP should get away unscathed,
> but ARM's implementation will bounce if inexact exceptions are enabled
What do you mean by this? OMAP uses ARM's cores.
> or in a few corner cases. Qualcomm is likely to be the worst affected
> by this.
>
> Will Deacon has tested debian armhf on a Cortex-A15 with VFP emulation
> support removed, which boots successfully.
Cortex-A9 and later lack hardware support for VFP vector operations.
Any code using these will fail to run without the software emulation.
Of course such code is already horribly slow on these cores and should
be fixed, so perhaps this is not such a terrible thing.
--
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-10 10:40 Removal of NWFPE in its entirety, and VFP emulation code Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 11:18 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2013-04-10 11:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 11:58 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-04-10 18:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 19:23 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-04-10 20:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 20:46 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-04-10 21:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 21:18 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-04-10 21:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-04-10 21:39 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-04-10 21:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 22:21 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-04-10 23:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-04-10 13:21 ` Will Deacon
2013-04-10 19:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 17:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-04-10 18:24 ` Steve McIntyre
2013-04-10 18:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 18:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-04-10 19:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-11 18:37 ` Imre Kaloz
2013-04-10 19:00 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-04-10 19:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-04-10 19:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 19:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-04-10 19:25 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-04-10 20:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 18:38 ` jonsmirl at gmail.com
2013-04-10 19:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 21:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 13:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1xmwt68whw.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com \
--to=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).