From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mans@mansr.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:48:09 +0100 Subject: Steps to submit a new arch/arm port In-Reply-To: <56016780.5080104@free.fr> (Mason's message of "Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:36:48 +0200") References: <56001B78.2090001@free.fr> <2206647.QPrIpE2UC0@wuerfel> <56016780.5080104@free.fr> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Mason writes: >> - the clock support should probably go to drivers/clk, unless this is >> a clocksource driver, which should go to drivers/clocksource. Add a >> DT binding spec. If you lack DT support, don't bother sending it, >> but send the rest anyway. > > I'll take a look at Mans' DT clock code, but I want to simplify it. I wrote the clock driver using some incomplete documentation for 865x, additional details gleaned from ancient vendor kernel source, plus trial and error on an 8643 chip. If I could have done it any simpler, I would have. I don't have any information on the 87xx series, so it's possible the clock tree is completely different there. -- M?ns Rullg?rd mans at mansr.com