From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mans@mansr.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=)
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 13:19:41 +0100
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] nb8800 suspend/resume support
In-Reply-To: <c1aeaa45-de6a-e643-8765-7dad58a8b038@free.fr> (Mason's message
 of "Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:34:31 +0200")
References: <33d1ab47-6098-5e3f-8a3c-f72626d07113@free.fr>
 <aa8885b8-e6bb-3624-2bf9-0bb40505ac54@free.fr>
 <dd883398-1511-0bfd-972b-a11ef8709f0d@free.fr>
 <yw1xshhagexd.fsf@mansr.com>
 <9e8e12b1-74e2-8323-ec16-eebda46b2a3d@free.fr>
 <yw1xo9rygdyu.fsf@mansr.com>
 <6906dccf-bec9-0fc8-a34a-c39c05ada917@free.fr>
 <yw1xk22mgdcx.fsf@mansr.com>
 <f1554ee7-2151-1304-c5c1-35264b9be5be@free.fr>
 <71dd7987-8c43-2548-5058-51a95658da71@free.fr>
 <c1aeaa45-de6a-e643-8765-7dad58a8b038@free.fr>
Message-ID: <yw1xy3r0g7xe.fsf@mansr.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> writes:

> IIUC, sender (desktop system) sends datagrams as fast as possible.
> Receiver (tango board) drops around 24% of all datagrams.
> I think this invalidates the theory that exhausting RX descriptors
> wedges RX DMA.

No, it doesn't.  The bottleneck causing packet loss could be somewhere
else.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd