From: "Subhash Jadavani" <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
To: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: 'Dolev Raviv' <draviv@codeaurora.org>,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, santoshsy@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 02/17] scsi: sysfs: don't add scsi_device if its already added
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:29:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001601cfd857$cb656d10$62304730$@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140924163829.GA9474@infradead.org>
> Ok. Can you move the is_visible check to scsi_sysfs_add_devices, should
be fine to place it just after the sdev_state check.
Sure, will move it in next patch.
-----Original Message-----
From: 'Christoph Hellwig' [mailto:hch@infradead.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 9:38 AM
To: Subhash Jadavani
Cc: 'Christoph Hellwig'; 'Dolev Raviv';
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org;
santoshsy@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 02/17] scsi: sysfs: don't add scsi_device if its
already added
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:27:47AM -0700, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
> No, It happens in this sequence of events:
> 1. LLD calls the __scsi_add_device() for well known logical units
> before
> scsi_scan_host() (This is done as part of [PATCH V5 10/17] scsi: ufs:
> manually add well known logical units). __scsi_add_device() will also
> add the scsi device to sysfs by calling scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() 2. Now
> LDD calls the scsi_scan_host() (Note that CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC is
> enabled) which will schedule the async scan. Device reports only
> normal LUs (no w-lus reported here) when REPORT LUNs in sent with
> SELECT REPORT cleared. At the end of async scan,
> scsi_finish_async_scan() calls scsi_sysfs_add_devices().
> scsi_sysfs_add_devices() iterates through all the scsi_device
> instances attached to Scsi_Host hence end up calling
> scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() 2nd time for the scsi_device which were already
> added explicitly by LDD.
Ok. Can you move the is_visible check to scsi_sysfs_add_devices, should be
fine to place it just after the sdev_state check.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-25 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-24 15:13 [PATCH/RESEND V5 00/17] UFS: Power management support Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:13 ` [PATCH V5 01/17] scsi: fixing the "type" for well known LUs Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-24 20:49 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-09-25 6:18 ` Subhash Jadavani
2014-09-24 15:13 ` [PATCH V5 02/17] scsi: sysfs: don't add scsi_device if its already added Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-24 16:27 ` Subhash Jadavani
2014-09-24 16:38 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2014-09-25 0:29 ` Subhash Jadavani [this message]
2014-09-24 15:13 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 03/17] scsi: ufs: Allow vendor specific initialization Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 04/17] scsi: ufs: Add regulator enable support Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 05/17] scsi: ufs: Add clock initialization support Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 06/17] scsi: ufs: add voting support for host controller power Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 07/17] scsi: ufs: refactor query descriptor API support Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 08/17] scsi: ufs: improve init sequence Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 09/17] scsi: ufs: Active Power Mode - configuring bActiveICCLevel Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH V5 10/17] scsi: ufs: manually add well known logical units Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 16:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-24 16:36 ` Subhash Jadavani
2014-09-24 16:40 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2014-09-24 16:59 ` Subhash Jadavani
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH V5 11/17] scsi: ufs: add UFS power management support Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 23:11 ` Akinobu Mita
2014-09-25 10:35 ` Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 12/17] scsi: ufs: refactor configuring power mode Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 13/17] scsi: ufs: Add support for clock gating Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 14/17] scsi: ufs: Add freq-table-hz property for UFS device Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 15/17] scsi: ufs: Add support for clock scaling using devfreq framework Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 16/17] scsi: ufs: tune bkops while power managment events Dolev Raviv
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [PATCH/RESEND V5 17/17] scsi: ufs: definitions for phy interface Dolev Raviv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001601cfd857$cb656d10$62304730$@codeaurora.org' \
--to=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=draviv@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santoshsy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).